Teams

Sweet Shots

2022 18&Over Women · 2.5

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-17vs QOCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Davis / Ana Amaya vs Marnie Carman / Ramona Hatcher Lauture6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSharon Jones vs Sunyoung Kim7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAleida Smack / Jenise Beaman vs Sassy Martinez / Arelis Avila4-6, 3-6
2022-07-14vs RacqueteersWon 30
W#1 DoublesAna Amaya / Lisa Davis vs Wei Dai / Nicole Rolston6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSharon Jones vs Victoria Tong6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJenise Beaman / Krysten Terry vs Edwena Peoples / Irma Pitter6-0, 6-0
2022-07-10vs QOCLost 03
L#1 DoublesPamela Barnes / Krysten Terry vs Marnie Carman / Sunyoung Kim0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSharon Jones vs Arelis Avila4-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda Brown / Nikki Thompson vs Sassy Martinez / Akiko Woodridge1-6, 1-6
2022-06-30vs RacqueteersWon 21
L#1 DoublesJenise Beaman / Brenda Brown vs Victoria Tong / Laura Davis5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSharon Jones vs Nicole Rolston6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAna Amaya / Nikki Thompson vs Edwena Peoples / Teresa Bhe6-1, 6-0
2022-06-26vs QOCLost 02
L#1 DoublesAna Amaya / Aleida Smack vs Marnie Carman / Arelis Avila0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda Brown / Lisa Davis vs Ramona Hatcher Lauture / Sassy Martinez3-6, 6-7
2022-06-23vs RacqueteersWon 20
W#1 DoublesAna Amaya / Nikki Thompson vs Irma Pitter / Deborah Russell-Brown6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJenise Beaman / Brenda Brown vs Wei Dai / Nicole Rolston7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1QOC50132473
2Sweet Shots339920151
3Racqueteers0521326163

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.17 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.43
Ana Amaya
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.15
Sharon Jones
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.08
Brenda Brown
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.02
Jenise Beaman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Nikki Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Pamela Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Amaya + Jenise Beaman2435% games−10.5% vs expected
Nikki Thompson + Ana Amaya213 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Brown + Jenise Beaman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ana Amaya
17W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.43
Sharon Jones
6W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Brenda Brown
4W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Jenise Beaman
7W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Nikki Thompson
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Barnes
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.