Teams

DNunn (Foxcroft East)

2024 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 8.5 Men - Thurs PM

9 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-07vs RMaddle (Raintree)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Nunn / Norm Cook vs Michael Moloney / Bernardo Llerenas3-6, 6-7
2024-10-03vs JClarke (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Nunn / Ravi Mujumdar vs Raj Voleti / Omar Punjabi6-7, 1-6
2024-09-09vs BSmith/JNichols (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTimothy Shaw / Daniel Nunn vs Avin Dwivedy / Chris Bauer4-6, 0-6
2024-08-29vs CSwaminathan (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNorm Cook / Nathan Bragg vs Diego Pazo / Devesh Patel6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-08-23vs CGluff (Palisades)Won 20
W#2 DoublesNorm Cook / Nathan Bragg vs Scott Swanson / Don Nelson6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDaniel Nunn / Grant Alexander vs Thomas Forrest / Wayne Ernest6-2, 7-6
2024-08-22vs FMasucci (WSRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesNorm Cook / Nathan Bragg vs Geoffrey Sessa / Paul Sperry6-2, 6-4
2024-08-15vs BChriscoe (Southampton)Won 10
W#3 DoublesGrant Alexander / Daniel Nunn vs Jason King / Wesley Barnes7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 8.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Richard Merino
published
4.22
Timothy Shaw
published
4.12
Ravi Mujumdar
published
4.07
Norm Cook
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.91
Jon Michael Thomas
published
3.84
Daniel Nunn
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.69
Richard Schanzlin
published
Frank Fisher
published
Richard Starling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jon Michael Thomas + Daniel Nunn213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Merino
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.24
Timothy Shaw
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
Ravi Mujumdar
19W–19L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Norm Cook
42W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.07
Jon Michael Thomas
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Daniel Nunn
102W–48L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
Richard Schanzlin
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Frank Fisher
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Starling
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.