Teams

Vanderham

2023 Tri Level · 4.0 Ladies

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Caroline Hawkins
published 4
3.74
Lauren Hall
published
3.70
Sonja Clark
published
3.40
Liana Proffer
published
3.26
Dana Walton
published 3
3.26
Shelley Matos
published
3.16
Genevieve Gabel
published 3
3.03
Brittan Peterson
published 3
Libby Ellington
published
Rachel Weinheimer
published
Ruth Grant
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelley Matos + Libby Ellington213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Courtney Vanderham
16W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Caroline Hawkins
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lauren Hall
11W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Sonja Clark
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Liana Proffer
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
3
Dana Walton
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%2%98%
3.26
Shelley Matos
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
3
Genevieve Gabel
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
3.16
3
Brittan Peterson
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
Libby Ellington
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachel Weinheimer
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ruth Grant
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.