Teams

MY Guy WSL A40-3.0W

2026 WMI WSL Adult 40&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI WSL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player)

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-20vs MVC Miller-Heys WSL A40-3.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesRebecca Edmonds / Shannon Carr vs Fiona Hert / Linda Miller-Heys5-7, 5-4
L#2 DoublesChristine Douma / Rebecca Durant vs Tammy Graves / Debra Sweemer4-6, 5-5
2026-05-06vs COE VanWieren WSL A40-3.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGina Schau / Nicolette Straley vs Mary Bratschi-VanWieren / Marcia Bratschi-Gresens4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBelinda McDougal / Christine Douma vs Nancy Lange / Anne Witherill6-2, 6-0
2026-04-22vs MVC Stafford WSL A40-3.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesShannon Carr / Rebecca Edmonds vs Michelle Hodsdon / Janet Romanowski6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBelinda McDougal / Rebecca Durant vs Somi Lim / Kelly Stafford6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGina Schau / Nicolette Straley vs Julie Sears / Dana Parent6-0, 7-6
2026-04-08vs HC Rix WSL A40-3.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesGina Schau / Rebecca Edmonds vs Beth Rix / Dawn Hildebrand6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBelinda McDougal / Christine Douma vs Jane VanderMeer / Kristi Turchan6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesNicolette Straley / Karen Alcaraz vs Kathryn Drummond / Kathleen Tubilewicz3-6, 1-6
2026-03-12vs ML Birtles WSL A40-3.0WWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Lou Guy / Gina Schau vs Melody Werner / Dona McGovern6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBelinda McDougal / Nicolette Straley vs Julie Taiber / Stephanie Short7-5, 7-6
2026-03-04vs PTC Chandler WSL A40-3.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Lou Guy / Gina Schau vs Julie Quist / Natalie Bernecker0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBelinda McDougal / Christine Douma vs Ruth Kohley / Volita Vinoski7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Alcaraz / Glenda VanStratton vs Sally Chandler / Barbara Lynn Freedman0-6, 0-6
2026-02-25vs WH Kamerling WSL A40-3.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGina Schau / Rebecca Edmonds vs Connie Kamerling / ROSEANN BLAHNIK4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRebecca Durant / Belinda McDougal vs Therese Miller / Ginger Owen7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · WMI WSL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WH Kamerling WSL A40-3.0W5212920192
2PTC Chandler WSL A40-3.0W5212924183
3HC Rix WSL A40-3.0W4314718175
4MVC Miller-Heys WSL A40-3.0W4313819182
5MVS McMahon WSL A40-3.0W43111021173
6ML Birtles WSL A40-3.0W43101123194
7COE VanWieren WSL A40-3.0W25101125184
8MY Guy WSL A40-3.0W#000000
9MVC Stafford WSL A40-3.0W0721940246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Rebecca Edmonds
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.89
Rebecca Durant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Mary Lou Guy
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Belinda McDougal
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3
Cindy Anderson
published 3
2.74
Gina Schau
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Nicolette Straley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.53
Christine Douma
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.22
Karen Alcaraz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.03
Glenda VanStratton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Shannon Carr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Douma + Belinda McDougal4452% games+9.5% vs expected
Mary Lou Guy + Gina Schau7847% games+5.7% vs expected
Belinda McDougal + Rebecca Durant2445% games+2.3% vs expected
Christine Douma + Mary Lou Guy132145% games+1.8% vs expected
Gina Schau + Rebecca Edmonds61046% games+0.9% vs expected
Rebecca Durant + Gina Schau2447% games−1.2% vs expected
Mary Lou Guy + Belinda McDougal2343% gamesnot enough data
Belinda McDougal + Gina Schau1435% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Edmonds
21W–57L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
Rebecca Durant
21W–58L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
Mary Lou Guy
34W–76L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Belinda McDougal
23W–49L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Cindy Anderson
28W–43L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Gina Schau
23W–48L career · 12 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Nicolette Straley
52W–102L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Christine Douma
58W–102L career · 4 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.53
Karen Alcaraz
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.22
2.5
Glenda VanStratton
0W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Shannon Carr
17W–28L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.