Teams

Sandbaggers

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - POCATELLO · Men 3.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesAlexander Flint / Rene Sepulveda Castro vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-15vs Ankle BreakersLost 14
L#1 DoublesJameson Johnson / Jeremy Wan vs Darren Hansen / Brian Young4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRene Sepulveda Castro vs Joshua Ellis3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGary Seymour / Alexander Flint vs Trent Fowers / Bradley Sutton7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesThomas Stuart vs David Dixon6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Kleist / Monte Gray vs Stephen Sutton / Howard Hansen2-6, 5-7
2021-06-07vs Ankle BreakersLost 13
L#1 DoublesJameson Johnson / Eric Devenberg vs Brian Young / Nathan Richardson0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAdan Eledesma vs Joshua Ellis6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRene Sepulveda Castro / Gary Seymour vs Stephen Sutton / Bradley Sutton6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTravis Stone / Jules Miller vs Howard Hansen / Trent Fowers1-6, 3-6
2021-06-01vs Ankle BreakersWon 41
W#1 DoublesJohn M Head / Jules Miller vs Levi Jensen / Dawson Brake6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMonte Gray vs Joshua Ellis0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesThomas Stuart / David Kleist vs Bradley Sutton / Stephen Sutton6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRene Sepulveda Castro vs Brian Young6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAlexander Flint / Jeremy Wan vs Howard Hansen / Nathan Richardson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-26vs Ankle BreakersLost 14
W#1 DoublesJohn M Head / Thomas Stuart vs Ross Hugues / Brian Young6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJules Miller vs David Dixon3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMonte Gray / Rene Sepulveda Castro vs Nathan Richardson / Stephen Sutton2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJameson Johnson vs Joshua Ellis2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEric Devenberg / Travis Stone vs Howard Hansen / Trent Fowers1-6, 1-6
2021-05-20vs Ankle BreakersWon 32
L#1 DoublesAlexander Flint / David Kleist vs Joshua Ellis / Brian Young2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesThomas Stuart vs Stephen Sutton6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEric Devenberg / Jameson Johnson vs Nathan Richardson / Howard Hansen0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesRene Sepulveda Castro vs Dawson Brake6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGary Seymour / Jules Miller vs Ross Hugues / Levi Jensen5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-17vs Ankle BreakersLost 23
W#1 DoublesRene Sepulveda Castro / David Kleist vs Brian Young / Darren Hansen6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesThomas Stuart vs Ross Hugues6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJohn M Head / Eric Devenberg vs Bradley Sutton / Howard Hansen2-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesAlexander Flint vs Nathan Richardson1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMonte Gray / Travis Stone vs Trent Fowers / Levi Jensen0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 3.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ankle Breakers43171839293
2Sandbaggers34181736252

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Rene Sepulveda Castro
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
Adan Eledesma
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Alexander Flint
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
David Kleist
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Eric Devenberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Gary Seymour
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jameson Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
John M Head
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jules Miller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Monte Gray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Thomas Stuart
usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Travis Stone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jules Miller + John M Head213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Rene Sepulveda Castro
87W–65L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
2.87
Adan Eledesma
1W–10L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Alexander Flint
9W–15L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
David Kleist
32W–26L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Eric Devenberg
5W–11L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Gary Seymour
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jameson Johnson
5W–24L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
John M Head
76W–74L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jules Miller
24W–44L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Monte Gray
1W–19L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Thomas Stuart
30W–9L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
Travis Stone
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.