Teams

MTS:Constantin

2021 NH Adult 55 & Over Men · 7.0M 1

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-12vs ALG:SeniorGaloots:MacLeodLost 02
L#1 DoublesPeter Podesta / Terry Gould vs Jeffrey Stone / Peter Breu7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharles O'Leary / Scott Reid vs Jack Chen / Andrew Gould6-7, 1-6
2021-05-22vs ALG:SeniorGaloots:MacLeodLost 03
L#1 DoublesTerry Gould / Peter Podesta vs Steve MacLeod / Jeffrey Stone1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJames Constantin / Scott Reid vs Jack Chen / Glenn Leo1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDarvi Rosenberg / Charles O'Leary vs Peter Breu / Andrew Gould6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2021-05-15vs ALG:SeniorGaloots:MacLeodLost 03
L#1 DoublesPeter Podesta / Terry Gould vs William Berry / Robert Normandin3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJames Constantin / Gary Mountford vs Glenn Leo / Jeffrey Stone5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCharles O'Leary / Darvi Rosenberg vs Jack Chen / Steve MacLeod1-6, 0-6
2021-05-08vs ALG:SeniorGaloots:MacLeodLost 12
W#1 DoublesTerry Gould / Peter Podesta vs Steve MacLeod / Jeffrey Stone6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesScott Reid / Charles O'Leary vs William Berry / Robert Normandin0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJames Constantin / Darvi Rosenberg vs Jack Chen / Glenn Leo3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0M 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ALG:SeniorGaloots:MacLeod04102666
2MTS:Constantin0421020127

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Gary Mountford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Peter Podesta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Terry Gould
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
James Constantin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Darvi Rosenberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Reid
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Podesta + Terry Gould7652% games+4.2% vs expected
Peter Podesta + Gary Mountford3446% games−3.6% vs expected
Darvi Rosenberg + Gary Mountford3252% gamesnot enough data
Gary Mountford + James Constantin1443% gamesnot enough data
Gary Mountford + Terry Gould044 matchesnot enough data
Darvi Rosenberg + James Constantin123 matchesnot enough data
Peter Podesta + James Constantin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gary Mountford
34W–34L career · 1 line in 2021
1%93%6%
3.29
Peter Podesta
54W–88L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Terry Gould
87W–132L career · 4 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
James Constantin
21W–42L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Darvi Rosenberg
10W–17L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Scott Reid
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.