Teams

3 KRA Green/Turner Smash Girls

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-28vs 17 TDC Team CauseySplit 11
L#1 SinglesSara Winterhoff vs Jamie Stokes2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesWhitney Sandridge / Carlyle Walek vs Anna Gibellato / Cris Latief6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-26vs 6 ACAC StephensLost 02
L#1 SinglesKatherine Fleck vs Kim Smith0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSara Winterhoff vs Christina Aeinan Kang2-6, 0-6
2022-05-21vs 15 Dominion WagnerWon 10
W#1 SinglesKatherine Fleck vs Nancy Price6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2022-05-07vs 11 WOCC HaasLost 01
L#1 SinglesSara Winterhoff vs Darlene Moehling1-6, 5-7
2022-04-30Won 10
W#1 SinglesKatherine Fleck vs Elizabeth Boyle6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-23vs 7 SCC Tornabene Sal's BerriesWon 21
L#1 SinglesSara Winterhoff vs Mary Knick2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKatherine Fleck vs Margaret Ryan6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Owens / Carlyle Walek vs Stacey Piotrowski / Michelle Phelan7-5, 6-4
2022-04-20vs 4 Westwood WestLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarlyle Walek / Sarah Deignan vs Heather Harker / Jennifer White4-6, 1-6
2022-04-13vs 1 Woodlake PoindexterSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKatherine Fleck vs Christine Lemons2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesCarlyle Walek vs Kathleen Laroche6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Whitney Sandridge
published
3.48
Lauren Turner
published
3.45
Carlyle Walek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Katherine Fleck
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Elizabeth Toohers
published 3.5
3.24
Sara Winterhoff
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.19
Wendy Daniel
published
3.04
Laurie Barnes
published
2.94
Kerri Green
published
2.90
Kaarin Gordon
published
2.49
Nancy Bryner
published
Robin Reifsnider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Fleck + Sara Winterhoff141645% games−2.9% vs expected
Laurie Barnes + Kerri Green033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Whitney Sandridge
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
Lauren Turner
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Carlyle Walek
129W–89L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
Katherine Fleck
65W–61L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Elizabeth Toohers
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Winterhoff
99W–86L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Wendy Daniel
15W–18L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Laurie Barnes
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
Kerri Green
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.94
Kaarin Gordon
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.90
Nancy Bryner
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.49
Robin Reifsnider
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.