Teams

Sons of Forest Hills

2022 Montgomery Adult 65 & Over Summer · Montgomery Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-15vs Strung Out 65+Won 10
W#2 DoublesIvan Teelucksingh / Richard McKeon vs Peter Bonaccorsi / David Kochanski6-4, 6-3
2022-08-11vs Strung Out 65+Won 10
W#1 DoublesWilliam Halfpap / Richard McKeon vs Peter Bonaccorsi / Timothy Brown6-3, 6-4
2022-07-30Won 20
W#1 DoublesDennis Weikel / William Trimble vs Steven Reed / Fred Roche6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKonrad Huppi / Richard McKeon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-24vs Strung Out 65+Won 10
W#1 DoublesDennis Weikel / Richard McKeon vs Dalton Delan / Chris Wertman6-4, 6-4
2022-07-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesDennis Weikel / Bob Levering vs Lawrence Schleifer / Fred Roche6-3, 6-1
2022-07-09vs Strung Out 65+Won 10
W#2 DoublesDennis Weikel / Juan Rivas vs Frederick Duque / Stanley Freeman6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Dennis Weikel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Bassem Melhem
published 3.5
2.89
Konrad Huppi
published
2.86
Juan Rivas
published
2.62
Richard McKeon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.35
Malcolm Frazier
published
William Halfpap
published
William Trimble
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juan Rivas + Richard McKeon2443% games−8.0% vs expected
Dennis Weikel + Richard McKeon91648% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dennis Weikel
147W–171L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Bassem Melhem
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Konrad Huppi
13W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.89
Juan Rivas
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Ivan Teelucksingh
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Richard McKeon
235W–409L career · 4 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.62
Malcolm Frazier
2W–16L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
2.35
William Halfpap
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
William Trimble
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.