Teams

Team 7 Wolves

2025 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-22Won 20
W#1 SinglesJiachang Chen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKai Yu / Zachary Zurich vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-07vs Team 13 Ball of DutyWon 20
W#1 DoublesJiachang Chen / Jie Wang vs Ryan McConaghy / Brad Haywood6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesZachary Zurich vs Amal Desai6-3, 6-0
2025-05-23vs Team 9 ChallengersWon 10
W#2 SinglesJiachang Chen vs Justin Hill6-3, 6-1
2025-05-17vs Team 1 District AcesWon 10
W#1 SinglesJiachang Chen vs Daniel Laursen6-3, 6-0
2025-05-06vs Team 5 RacqueteersSplit 11
L#1 SinglesBoming Zhang vs Ronnie Greene2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJiachang Chen / Jesse Tu vs Hassaan Karim / John Burns6-2, 6-1
2025-04-18Won 20
W#2 SinglesBoming Zhang vs Patrick Hendy6-2, 4-3
W#3 DoublesZachary Zurich / Jeff Gu vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-04vs Team 8 PiF3.5 18Lost 01
L#2 SinglesBoming Zhang vs Victor Sanchez1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Jiachang Chen
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
Xin Geng
published
3.36
Jesse Tu
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.34
Zachary Zurich
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Jie Wang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.32
FENG LI
published
3.32
Frank Wang
published
3.28
YANG LIU
published
3.25
Kun Sun
published
3.08
Jeff Gu
published
3.03
Boming Zhang
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.94
Kai Yu
published
2.81
Wei Lu
published
Ming Wei
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jiachang Chen
23W–18L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
Xin Geng
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Jesse Tu
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Zachary Zurich
29W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Jie Wang
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
FENG LI
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Frank Wang
18W–20L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
YANG LIU
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Kun Sun
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Jeff Gu
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Boming Zhang
19W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Kai Yu
6W–15L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
Wei Lu
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.81
Ming Wei
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.