Teams

Match Point Mamas

2024 OKCAdult 18 & Over League · 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.40 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-10vs OverservedLost 23
W#1 DoublesMargo Ward / Emily Kitch vs Amber Vawter / Corinne Greenfield6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMegan Griffith vs Kate Perkins2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Smith / Lindsey Diffendaffer vs Kathryn Johnson / Lenice Cattley3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesTiara Amantine vs Natalie Simon6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDanielle Coats / Lee Anne Stone vs Heather Ross / Seda Bakir4-6, 2-6
2024-05-31vs MoValley/Madden/18&over3.5WLost 05
L#1 DoublesEmily Kitch / Niki McClintock vs Wendy Madden / Casey Gonzalez4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDanielle Coats vs Sarah Patel0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusie Vesper / Debra Kos vs Dallas Miller / Avilone Doan4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMegan Griffith vs Chelsea Ragland0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNatalee Knight-Glass / Kelly Hayes vs Amy High / Lucia Chavez5-7, 2-6
2024-05-13vs Kiss My AceLost 23
L#1 DoublesMargo Ward / Dana Garner vs Lauren Moore / Fabiola Rivera2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesTiara Amantine vs Brittany McKnight6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Mullen / Niki McClintock vs Gamage Dilini Perera / Tammy Gill6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMegan Griffith vs Lisa Nguyen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNatalee Knight-Glass / Kelly Hayes vs Diane Little / Sue Helton1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-29vs TD Academy 3.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLindsey Diffendaffer / Sarah Smith vs Terri Nevin-Hesselroth / Amy Laizure3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDana Garner / Lisa Mullen vs Liz Adams / Erin McClelland6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCharlie Knight / Margo Ward vs Sarai Baird / Susan Bouzerand4-6, 5-7
2024-04-08vs Volley StarzLost 14
W#1 DoublesEmily Kitch / Debra Kos vs Sandy Grace / Valerie Oakley6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesTiara Amantine vs Amy Woolsey3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLee Anne Stone / Danielle Coats vs Kay Brezny / Brenda Hise3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesMegan Griffith vs Sherie Trice6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNiki McClintock / Dana Garner vs Jill Raines / Gayle MacKenzie-Morain4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Emily Kitch
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.42
Tiara Amantine
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.38
Margo Ward
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Lindsey Diffendaffer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Niki McClintock
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 8% · published
3.17
Dana Garner
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Lee Anne Stone
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
3.04
Natalee Knight-Glass
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
2.94
Danielle Coats
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Charlie Knight
published 3
Debra Kos
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
Kelly Hayes
published
Lisa Mullen
published
Megan Griffith
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Susie Vesper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Garner + Susie Vesper5165% games+13.0% vs expected
Lee Anne Stone + Danielle Coats9459% games+9.0% vs expected
Dana Garner + Lee Anne Stone15761% games+4.5% vs expected
Niki McClintock + Dana Garner261257% games+2.5% vs expected
Niki McClintock + Lee Anne Stone19960% games+1.7% vs expected
Niki McClintock + Natalee Knight-Glass7163% games+1.3% vs expected
Debra Kos + Lee Anne Stone5159% games+0.3% vs expected
Niki McClintock + Susie Vesper5068% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Kitch
18W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
Tiara Amantine
37W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.42
Margo Ward
23W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
3.38
Lindsey Diffendaffer
57W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
Niki McClintock
141W–65L career · 12 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Dana Garner
121W–60L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
Lee Anne Stone
78W–35L career · 8 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Natalee Knight-Glass
86W–82L career · 10 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.04
3.5
Danielle Coats
60W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Charlie Knight
18W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Debra Kos
36W–21L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelly Hayes
71W–43L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Mullen
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Griffith
40W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susie Vesper
73W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.