Teams

PSC-Wang

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women

1 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Priscilla McAughan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
Results9 ties
2022-08-28Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPriscilla McAughan / Kaila Yun vs Amanda Solomon / Sandy Garry6-4, 6-3
2022-08-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesKaila Yun / Priscilla McAughan vs Theresa Helland / Sally Harn6-3, 6-2
2022-08-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesPriscilla McAughan / Anh Hoang vs Raini Spitze / Jennifer Schmelling6-3, 7-6
2022-06-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Evans / Priscilla McAughan vs Caroline Truong / Denise Zwald6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-20Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPriscilla McAughan / Florence Stahura vs Britt Allen / Luna Wang6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2022-05-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesPriscilla McAughan / Liza Skorupski vs Laurie Ono / Holly Yang7-5, 6-4
2022-04-30Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Evans / Priscilla McAughan vs Tessie Decker / Mindy Blakeslee6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-04-23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLaurie Federman / Priscilla McAughan vs Annie Knudson / Kaci Okumoto7-5, 6-1
2022-04-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesKim Evans / Priscilla McAughan vs Sally Devine Wright / Tess Thoresen6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Priscilla McAughan
60W–85L career
31%69%0%
3.93

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.