Teams

DMaguire (Jeff Adams)

2023 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 6.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-25vs NMurphy (Weddington)Split 11
W#1 DoublesBrenda Jandebeur / Rae Lynn Pope vs Shay Hartley / Tracy Lacroix6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPamela Quinn / Mary McGarvey vs Susan Staley / Lynn Davis0-6, 3-6
2023-09-18vs JThaker/GHolmes (BCC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary McGarvey / Brenda Jandebeur vs Barbara Reichard / Julie Derrico3-6, 2-6
2023-09-11vs KNovak (Charlotte Indoor)Won 20
W#1 DoublesBrenda Jandebeur / Rae Lynn Pope vs Elaine Pavimitriou / Vicki Greenway6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary McGarvey / Nathalie Malter vs DeeDee Fanning / Lynne Herrin6-2, 6-1
2023-09-06vs SDickson (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary McGarvey / Brenda Jandebeur vs Cyndie Hobson / Gabriela ROY2-6, 1-1
2023-08-21vs SReynolds (Piper Glen)Won 20
W#1 DoublesBrenda Jandebeur / Rae Lynn Pope vs Patti Tobin / Kim Sheehey6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDiane Turner Bearss / Mary McGarvey vs Jo Dockins / Susan DeVore6-4, 6-2
2023-08-14vs EKyle (FCC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDiane Turner Bearss / Mary McGarvey vs Brenda Cage / Dorie de Armas6-1, 6-2
2023-08-07vs KIrwin (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRae Lynn Pope / Brenda Jandebeur vs Carol Scott / Julie Linder6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Rae Lynn Pope
published
3.00
Brenda Jandebeur
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Yvonne Ceran
published
2.87
Mary McGarvey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Dina Maguire
published
2.48
Carrie Letorney
published 3
2.47
Nathalie Malter
published
2.34
Pamela Quinn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Jandebeur + Mary McGarvey3253% gamesnot enough data
Rae Lynn Pope + Yvonne Ceran4169% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rae Lynn Pope
68W–63L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
3
Brenda Jandebeur
164W–219L career · type A · 9 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
Yvonne Ceran
18W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Mary McGarvey
73W–67L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
2.87
Dina Maguire
19W–39L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Carrie Letorney
15W–29L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.48
Nathalie Malter
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.47
Pamela Quinn
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.