Teams

ACAC Baby Got Backhand (Tandett)

2022 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs TDC SteinerWon 10
W#1 DoublesMartinique Kandl / Anne Townsend vs Gretchen Brophy / Debra Kramen6-2, 6-3
2022-07-18vs Woodlake SchneebergerWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy McGlynn / Barbara Kasten vs Irene Shepherd / Blanka White7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-14vs Burkwood CookWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Funk / Martinique Kandl vs Ellen Bedichek / DAYNA SCHOOLS6-3, 6-3
2022-07-11vs Hermitage WiertelLost 01
L#1 DoublesJodi Tandett / Barbara Kasten vs Elizabeth Wiertel / AMY LINES3-6, 3-6
2022-07-07vs ACAC HarrisonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy McGlynn / Martinique Kandl vs Mary Knick / Faith Kallman2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Jones / Barbara Kasten vs Susan Cheatham / Susan Winckler6-1, 6-1
2022-07-05vs TDC McCormickWon 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly Jones / Martinique Kandl vs Meigan Sullivan / Tonya Atack6-2, 6-1
2022-06-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesBarbara Kasten / Jodi Tandett vs Tanya Huff / Frances Lee Farmer6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Martinique Kandl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Jodi Tandett
published
3.29
Anne Townsend
published 3.5
3.26
Stacy McLeod
published
3.25
Barbara Kasten
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Jill Bunn
published
3.06
Jennifer Funk
published
2.94
Amy Romero
published 3
2.82
Mari Litz
published
2.66
Jackie Granger
published 3
2.62
Ali Silva
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martinique Kandl + Barbara Kasten6160% gamesnot enough data
Amy Romero + Anne Townsend224 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Tandett + Barbara Kasten123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Martinique Kandl
167W–65L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
Jodi Tandett
18W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Anne Townsend
33W–23L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Stacy McLeod
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Barbara Kasten
158W–66L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Jill Bunn
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
Jennifer Funk
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Amy Romero
21W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
2.94
Mari Litz
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Jackie Granger
20W–14L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Ali Silva
8W–15L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.