Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Handlon/Assemi

2023 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 3.5W

15 players · average NTRP 3.39 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-12vs Sports Mall-Lake/KnowltonSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesCarolyn Cottle / Megan Reardon vs Debra Knowlton / Michelle Edwards2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 Female DoublesMaryam Klock / Rikke Phinney vs Claudine Finlay / Britany Egan6-3, 1-5, 1-0
W#1 Female DoublesMaryam Klock / Laurie Summers vs Rebecca Harman / Emily Hales1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 Female DoublesJennifer Sweat / Summer Borla vs Natasha Plyer / Nooshin Prasthofer6-4, 6-2
2023-11-28vs Ivory Ridge-AdamsSplit 11
L#2 Female DoublesLaurie Summers / Elaine Day vs Monique Tidd / Carol Oltjen5-7, 3-5
W#3 Female DoublesHannah Lee / Summer Borla vs Heidi Beckstead / Jennifer Wells7-6, 1-3, 1-0
2023-11-14Lost 01
L#3 Female DoublesNamrata Handlon / Carolyn Cottle vs Katie Swensen / Mikkel Williams6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-11-07vs Sunpro-Westover/HallLost 12
L#1 Female DoublesElaine Day / Megan Reardon vs Raquel Westover / Melanie Hall1-6, 3-6
L#2 Female DoublesJennifer Sweat / Julie Carlston vs Tiffany Ashman / Jenni Warner2-6, 5-4, 0-1
W#3 Female DoublesNamrata Handlon / Carolyn Cottle vs Laurie Lewis / Sherston Faux6-4, 6-3
2023-10-31vs Ogden-AndersenSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesCarolyn Cottle / Namrata Handlon vs Sally Anderson / Becky Hall5-7, 4-2, 1-0
L#2 Female DoublesShoeleh Assemi / Maryam Klock vs JaNean Nelson / Tana Coleman4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 3.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Shoff/Brown602138115
2Liberty Park Tennis-Swensen/Sampson6016821161
3Sunpro-Parker/Stringham5116820172
4Salt Lake Tennis-Cracroft4215922182
5Sunpro-Westover/Hall42111329189
6Cottonwood Club-Annunziata3315923203
7Sports Mall-Lake/Knowlton3316824206
8Liberty Park Tennis-Handlon/Assemi33131128207
9Ivory Ridge-Adams3391531214
10Ivory Ridge-Rowland/Aubrey24101430205
11Ogden-Andersen2491533225
12Wasatch Rec Center-Wade/Dagley2471736232
13Liberty Park Tennis-Leishman/Ewing1581636240
14Sports Mall-England/Rozsa1571737238
15Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/Chandromouli0671736237

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Haley Swan
published 3.5
3.28
Hannah Lee
published 3.5
3.28
Julie Carlston
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elisabeth Nebeker
published 3.5
Hediyeh Baradaran
published 3.5
3.25
Megan Reardon
published
3.10
Carolyn Cottle
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #3 Female Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Maryam Klock
usually #2 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Jennifer Sweat
published
2.93
Rikke Phinney
published
2.89
Summer Borla
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Elaine Day
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 3
Laurie Summers
published
Namrata Handlon
published
Shoeleh Assemi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Namrata Handlon + Shoeleh Assemi9851% games+2.9% vs expected
Summer Borla + Hannah Lee7061% games+2.5% vs expected
Namrata Handlon + Carolyn Cottle121052% games+1.8% vs expected
Laurie Summers + Maryam Klock9549% games+1.8% vs expected
Summer Borla + Jennifer Sweat7852% games−2.0% vs expected
Megan Reardon + Carolyn Cottle5948% games−2.1% vs expected
Jennifer Sweat + Maryam Klock1641% games−2.4% vs expected
Namrata Handlon + Jennifer Sweat2339% games−6.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Haley Swan
37W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Hannah Lee
103W–77L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Julie Carlston
24W–40L career · 1 line in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Elisabeth Nebeker
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Hediyeh Baradaran
40W–23L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Reardon
40W–56L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Carolyn Cottle
113W–130L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Maryam Klock
77W–92L career · 3 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
Jennifer Sweat
135W–130L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.96
Rikke Phinney
44W–49L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
Summer Borla
123W–150L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Elaine Day
124W–248L career · 2 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
2.64
Laurie Summers
46W–63L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Namrata Handlon
62W–57L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shoeleh Assemi
37W–81L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.