Teams

Alaska Hackers

2025 Fall Combo -2 Sundays · 7.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.92 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-15vs SABRSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Larson / Rey Nino Estrella vs Joseph Hout / Matthew Do6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWilliam Cotton / Joe Buckwalter vs Ryan Jaramillo / Krisada Meephothong5-7, 2-2
2024-09-15vs SABRSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAllen Clendaniel / Jonathon Taylor vs Phuripak Sukanthanag / Jeremy Conkling2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRey Nino Estrella / Benjamin Larson vs Matthew Do / Joseph Hout6-2, 1-6, 7-6
2024-09-08vs SABRLost 12
L#1 DoublesJonathon Taylor / Benjamin Larson vs Phuripak Sukanthanag / Matthew Do1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRey Nino Estrella / Christian Dougherty vs Jeremy Conkling / Ryan Jaramillo3-5
W#3 DoublesCurtis Nelson / William Cotton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-08vs SABRLost 12
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Larson / Rey Nino Estrella vs Matthew Do / Joseph Hout7-6, 6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJoe Buckwalter / Jonathon Taylor vs Ryan Jaramillo / Krisada Meephothong2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCurtis Nelson / William Cotton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SABR4084984
2Alaska Hackers044816119

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christian Dougherty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Benjamin Larson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Allen Clendaniel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Joe Buckwalter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Curtis Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Rey Nino Estrella
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
William Cotton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jonathon Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allen Clendaniel + Jonathon Taylor123 matchesnot enough data
Benjamin Larson + Rey Nino Estrella213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christian Dougherty
4W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Benjamin Larson
19W–12L career · type M · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Allen Clendaniel
84W–53L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Joe Buckwalter
88W–77L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Curtis Nelson
72W–65L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Rey Nino Estrella
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
William Cotton
20W–47L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Jonathon Taylor
6W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.