Teams

LOCH.Gloer

2023 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-06vs TOC.DoyleLost 02
L#1 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Stefanie Cage6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSherry Lockhart vs Jenny Doyle3-6, 0-6
2023-11-22vs TOC.SziksaiSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSherry Lockhart vs Button Hall7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Katya Lundberg7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-11-08Lost 02
L#1 SinglesSherry Lockhart vs Chanel Chambers4-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesMeredith Kinkle vs Julia Gabennesch0-6, 3-6
2023-11-02vs TOC.SziksaiWon 21
L#1 SinglesThaiza Gloer vs Suyeon Kim3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesVanessa Gloer vs Erin McAllister6-4, 7-5
W#3 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Button Hall4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-25vs TOC.DoyleWon 20
W#1 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Jenny Doyle5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMeredith Kinkle vs Maria Montano Briones6-1, 6-3
2023-10-11vs TOC.SziksaiLost 12
L#1 SinglesThaiza Gloer vs Rebekah Schloemann2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesVanessa Gloer vs Katya Lundberg2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Erin McAllister6-2, 6-2
2023-10-04Lost 01
L#2 SinglesSherry Lockhart vs Julia Gabennesch3-6, 1-6
2023-09-20vs TOC.SziksaiLost 12
L#1 SinglesVanessa Gloer vs Betsy Shane5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMeredith Kinkle vs Nikki DAmbrose5-7, 3-6
W#3 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Xylena Simone Sziksai6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Thaiza Gloer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.73
Susan Marie Hill
published
3.65
Vanessa Gloer
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.55
Yvette LeGrande
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
Christine Reinke
published 3.5
3.40
Sherry Lockhart
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Meredith Kinkle
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 38% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thaiza Gloer + Vanessa Gloer151153% games−0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Thaiza Gloer
101W–65L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
Susan Marie Hill
25W–17L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Vanessa Gloer
88W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Yvette LeGrande
140W–139L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Christine Reinke
47W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Sherry Lockhart
79W–93L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Meredith Kinkle
62W–58L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.