Teams

K.Southern

2023 Cap Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-09vs A.PershkeLost 01
L#1 DoublesNora Stacey / Cosette Philpot vs Emily Best / Catie Cunningham6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2023-05-02vs G.Scoggin 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesDebra Hauge / Karen Southern vs Janice Garside / Patricia Weston6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCathy Couch / Cosette Philpot vs Ameshia Turlington / Eden Jenkins6-4, 7-6
2023-04-18vs M.Heath/HowardWon 20
W#1 DoublesDebra Hauge / Genny Igo vs Taylor Cheek / Kelsey Gilchrist4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Southern / Michele Lagerstedt vs Laura Simson / Lindsey Howard6-4, 6-3
2023-04-11vs J.LiddleWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Southern / Debra Hauge vs Julie Karg / Susan Cokas4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-06Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKaren Southern vs Jennifer Taylor0-6, 1-6
2023-03-28vs A.PershkeWon 21
W#1 DoublesNora Stacey / Debra Hauge vs Marlet Edwards / Katherine Rostick6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Vandecarr / Cosette Philpot vs Ann Pershke / Emily Best6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCathy Couch / Michele Lagerstedt vs Josie Tattersall / Meta Bartley5-7, 3-6
2023-03-21vs G.Scoggin 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesNora Stacey / Debra Hauge vs Ameshia Turlington / Janice Garside6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Southern / Michele Lagerstedt vs Alisa Smith / Eden Jenkins6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2023-03-07vs M.Heath/HowardSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCathy Couch / Karen Southern vs Celia Whited / Jennifer Bissette3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKellie Bradley / Cosette Philpot vs Meagan Heath / Katie Wilson7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Debra Hauge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Karen Southern
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Michele Lagerstedt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Genny Igo
published 3
2.63
Ann Mailly
published 3
2.54
2.46
Elisabeth Nixon
published 3
2.30
Cosette Philpot
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Hauge + Karen Southern5548% games+4.3% vs expected
Karen Southern + Michele Lagerstedt5357% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Debra Hauge
73W–64L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Karen Southern
87W–112L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Michele Lagerstedt
58W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Genny Igo
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Ann Mailly
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Elizabeth Vandecarr
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Elisabeth Nixon
2W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.46
3
Cosette Philpot
30W–74L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.