Teams

Triumphant

2025 Tri-Level League · Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-13vs Just TRI usSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSonia Daniels / Brianna Eilers vs Yvonne Uhl / Kathy Burkholder6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMolly Miller / Maria Elizabeth Lozano vs Carrie Ervin / Claudia Burkhardt7-6, 1-1
2024-10-12vs Lady LuxeLost 02
L#2 DoublesBrianna Eilers / Melba Trevino vs Carmen Vecchini / Chloe Martin7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaula Gerloff / Maria Elizabeth Lozano vs Faith Horan / Michelle Ottmers6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-12vs TriadWon 20
W#2 DoublesSonia Daniels / Brianna Eilers vs Gail Saathoff / Mary Cirilo6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMolly Miller / Carmen Ahmed vs Maria Guerra / Lisa Trapp6-3, 6-3
2024-10-11vs Shadow TriadSplit 11
W#2 DoublesInes Iglesias / Melba Trevino vs Julie Jacob / Sandy Pena6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCarmen Ahmed / Paula Gerloff vs Diana Garcia / Alexia Nadler6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Kirstin Clark
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.02
Jill Rogers Fitch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.84
Kristin Ortiz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Andrea Turk
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Monica Lindsey
published
3.64
Ines Iglesias
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.56
Melba Trevino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Brianna Eilers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Sonia Daniels
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Maria Elizabeth Lozano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Paula Gerloff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Carmen Ahmed
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Turk + Jill Rogers Fitch5069% gamesnot enough data
Brianna Eilers + Melba Trevino123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kirstin Clark
42W–17L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
4.08
Jill Rogers Fitch
48W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
4.02
Kristin Ortiz
38W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Andrea Turk
52W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
Monica Lindsey
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Ines Iglesias
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.64
Melba Trevino
34W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.56
4
Brianna Eilers
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.53
Sonia Daniels
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
Maria Elizabeth Lozano
15W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
3.36
Paula Gerloff
32W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
3
Carmen Ahmed
56W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.