Teams

KY/LEX/McGuire

2025 USTA SINGLES LEAGUE 40 & OVER · Women 3.5 (Singles)

5 players · average NTRP / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-02vs KY/LEX/ErnstWon 21
L#1 SinglesKatina Swansegar vs Heather Thompson4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesLisa Price vs Patti Stanton6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesElizabeth Hardwick vs Jennifer Ernst7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-17vs KY/LEX/ErnstLost 12
W#1 SinglesLisa Price vs Christina Bishop4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKatina Swansegar vs Emily Diehl1-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesRegina Covington vs Patti Stanton1-6, 5-7
2025-08-12vs KY/LEX/ErnstSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRegina Covington vs Heather Thompson6-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Hardwick vs Victoria Sward6-4, 7-6
2025-07-31vs KY/LEX/ErnstLost 03
L#1 SinglesKatina Swansegar vs Jennifer Ernst5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRegina Covington vs Christina Bishop1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesElizabeth Hardwick vs Victoria Sward7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-21vs KY/LEX/ErnstLost 03
L#1 SinglesLisa Price vs Emily Diehl4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesRegina Covington vs Jennifer Ernst2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesElizabeth Hardwick vs Heather Thompson3-6, 4-6
2025-07-07vs KY/LEX/ErnstLost 12
L#1 SinglesLisa Price vs Heather Thompson7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Hardwick vs Christina Bishop3-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesKatina Swansegar vs Victoria Sward6-2, 6-1
2025-06-29vs KY/LEX/ErnstLost 12
W#1 SinglesLisa Price vs Heather Thompson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKatina Swansegar vs Emily Diehl0-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesElizabeth Hardwick vs Jennifer Ernst4-6, 5-7
2025-06-16vs KY/LEX/ErnstWon 21
W#1 SinglesKatina Swansegar vs Patti Stanton6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLisa Price vs Jennifer Ernst1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRegina Covington vs Victoria Sward3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 (Singles) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Katina Swansegar
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.15
Lisa Price
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.93
Regina Covington
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
2.86
Elizabeth Hardwick
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Tara Swan
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katina Swansegar
19W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Lisa Price
17W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Regina Covington
16W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Elizabeth Hardwick
15W–26L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Tara Swan
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.