Teams

LTA BLUE

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-22vs RMTC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesStephanie Stone / Karen Dauer vs Leslie Krug / Karen Deierhoi6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKristin Parsons vs Rebecca Mazzaro3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnita Taylor / Linda Ducay vs Connie Champ / Emiko Childs6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSonia Marrero / Sally Meier vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-15vs LTA REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKris Graham / Jennifer Arndt vs Maureen Hartigan / Dennette Stroh4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesGloria Andrews vs Michelle Rozek6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKristin Parsons / Tanya Eisele vs Jody Reenan / Dena Stark4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSally Meier / Karen Dauer vs Claire Schlosser / Anna Liddell6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-07-08vs BTA BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesKris Graham / Jennifer Arndt vs Ann Larson / Lisa Maggio6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlicia Hillen / Gloria Andrews vs Mary Fitzgibbon / Damaris Ayuso6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLinda Ducay / Sonia Marrero vs Colleen Weaverling / Sarah Abernathey2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-07-01vs MEA REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKris Graham / Jennifer Arndt vs Karen Kruse / Jinfang Li7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSally Meier vs Susan Lewis3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Stone / Alicia Hillen vs Martha Lanaghen / Judy Savage2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Dauer / Anita Taylor vs Molly Kirk / Tina Aweida6-2, 6-0
2021-06-24vs CVTA NAVYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKris Graham / Kristin Parsons vs Sonia Johnson / Mary Buchanan6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSally Meier vs Sunnie Glaister1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTanya Eisele / Stephanie Stone vs Jennifer Carlson / Denise Boselli4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlicia Hillen / Sonia Marrero vs Heather Petryna / Sueann Holland6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-17vs RMTC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesKris Graham / Kristin Parsons vs Connie Champ / Joellen Rountree6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGloria Andrews vs Karen Deierhoi4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlicia Hillen / Sonia Marrero vs Susan Soklin / Leslie Krug6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnita Taylor / Linda Ducay vs Leslie Kennedy / Jeanne Christenson7-6, 6-1
2021-06-10vs LTA REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesJennifer Arndt / Tanya Eisele vs Kathy Doyle / Anna Liddell1-6, 0-3
L#1 SinglesGloria Andrews vs Michelle Rozek2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKristin Parsons / Stephanie Stone vs Jody Reenan / Dennette Stroh4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlicia Hillen / Karen Dauer vs Maureen Hartigan / Debra Heiser1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Anita Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.39
Kris Graham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Stephanie Stone
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Gloria Andrews
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Jennifer Arndt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Kristin Parsons
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.18
Karen Dauer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Sally Meier
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Tanya Eisele
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Linda Ducay
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Sonia Marrero
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Alicia Hillen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Meier + Kris Graham6652% games+7.5% vs expected
Kris Graham + Gloria Andrews5258% games+6.2% vs expected
Gloria Andrews + Kristin Parsons241953% games+5.4% vs expected
Tanya Eisele + Stephanie Stone251953% games+4.7% vs expected
Sally Meier + Alicia Hillen7554% games+4.7% vs expected
Alicia Hillen + Sonia Marrero7358% games+4.0% vs expected
Sally Meier + Jennifer Arndt5551% games+4.0% vs expected
Alicia Hillen + Kristin Parsons2453% games+3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anita Taylor
88W–64L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.52
Kris Graham
131W–121L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%80%19%
3.39
Stephanie Stone
74W–52L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Gloria Andrews
105W–128L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Jennifer Arndt
134W–128L career · 4 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
Kristin Parsons
105W–103L career · 5 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Karen Dauer
80W–57L career · 4 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Sally Meier
58W–70L career · 4 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.05
Tanya Eisele
52W–55L career · 3 lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Linda Ducay
119W–124L career · 3 lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04
Sonia Marrero
17W–26L career · 3 lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Alicia Hillen
39W–72L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.