Teams

Davis/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 2.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-15vs Thornton/MemphisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Bull / Ellie Gibbs vs Jade Thornton / Joy Watkins6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAdeola Faleye / Brooke Davis vs BriAnn Gibson / Loni Proctor6-4, 6-1
2025-11-01vs Justice/MemphisWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Bull / Ellie Gibbs vs Anna Embry / Neely Mcdurmon6-2, 6-0
2025-10-29vs Ray/MemphisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEllie Gibbs / Jessie Williams vs Stephanie Juneau / Lexi Dickerson0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Bull / Brooke Davis vs Alexis Sanders / Xeneia Sorrell6-3, 6-3
2025-10-26vs Wright/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesJessie Williams / Ellie Gibbs vs Julie Upchurch / Kelcie Nollner5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Davis / Amy Bull vs Alecia Monett / Tracy Lombardo4-6, 2-6
2025-10-18vs Lewis/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesJessica Arth / Adeola Faleye vs Ashley Walker / Hillary Barney3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Davis / Jennifer Kettler vs Jacqueline Smith / Courtney Neville2-6, 2-6
2025-10-09vs Scott/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesEllie Gibbs / Jessie Williams vs Amber Varner / Madeline Wilson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Davis / Amy Bull vs Mary Schlais / Caroline Moses7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2025-10-04vs Ray/MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesEllie Gibbs / Jessie Williams vs Amber Pettis / Stephanie Juneau6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmy Bull / Brooke Davis vs Xeneia Sorrell / Lesley Patel6-4, 6-2
2025-09-28vs Thornton/MemphisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDanielle Brewer / Ellie Gibbs vs Jade Thornton / Joy Watkins4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrooke Davis / Jessie Williams vs BriAnn Gibson / Morgan Thornton6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McDermott/Memphis7118614136
2Rohlinger/Memphis6219510134
3Justice/Memphis6216819157
4Greer/Memphis5317717190
5Thornton/Memphis53131124202
6Davis/Memphis44121224191
7Wright/Memphis44121227217
8Witte/Memphis44111328197
9Flynt/Memphis26101431228
10McLaughlin/Memphis2691532231
11SLewis/Memphis2681633239
12Steffner/Memphis2691533240
13Magness/Memphis0812347291

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.20 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.38
Ellie Gibbs
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.18
Adeola Faleye
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.03
Brooke Davis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jennifer Kettler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jessica Arth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ellie Gibbs
24W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.38
2.5
Adeola Faleye
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Brooke Davis
9W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Jennifer Kettler
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jessica Arth
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.