Teams

Schulzes/18s/3.0/NC

2025 Man · Cov Mixed 18 & Over

17 players · average NTRP 2.81 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Caleb Mcdonald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.76
Casey Culbreath
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published 3
Andrew Killebrew
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
April Schulze
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.68
Benjamin Hollywood
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.41
Christin Vilardo
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.38
Billy Beasley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.00
Ashlyn Armand
usually #3 Doubles 73%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 2.5
Jean Paul Templet
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Karl Schulze
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Luis Angel Perez Roman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Lynette Lobell
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Matthew Salas
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Mignon Hess
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
Natalie Oubre
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Philip Qualls
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Tabitha Lobell
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casey Culbreath + Matthew Salas2338% gamesnot enough data
Lynette Lobell + Christin Vilardo224 matchesnot enough data
Karl Schulze + April Schulze033 matchesnot enough data
Christin Vilardo + Luis Angel Perez Roman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caleb Mcdonald
15W–17L career · 14 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Casey Culbreath
10W–13L career · 13 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Andrew Killebrew
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
April Schulze
2W–10L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Benjamin Hollywood
7W–13L career · 8 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
2.5
Christin Vilardo
13W–29L career · 14 lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
2.5
Billy Beasley
7W–30L career · 10 lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.38
2.5
Ashlyn Armand
1W–15L career · 11 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Jean Paul Templet
6W–7L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karl Schulze
9W–16L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luis Angel Perez Roman
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynette Lobell
8W–17L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Salas
7W–16L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mignon Hess
30W–34L career · 29 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Oubre
4W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Philip Qualls
9W–14L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tabitha Lobell
14W–10L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.