Teams

Roedel/Memphis

2025 Adult 55 & Over-Memphis · 3.5 Men 55 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-28vs Lourens/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesKevin Roedel / Kevin Gallimore vs Rob Dannemiller / Anthony Lourens6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKevin Wright / barry puckett vs Bret Sokoloff / James Bishop1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Castany / Darrell Nephew vs Bill Basinger / Paul Benson6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-19vs Sentilles/MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Castany / Warwick Garner vs Stephen Karnes / Chris Wood3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 Doublesbarry puckett / Floriano Novoa vs David Boshers / John Wilbourn3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-03-24vs Lourens/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesKevin Roedel / Kevin Gallimore vs Rob Dannemiller / Bret Sokoloff7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDarrell Nephew / barry puckett vs Patrick Heraty / Anthony Lourens1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDavid van Horn / John Manshack vs James Bishop / Javier Vasquez6-4, 6-1
2025-03-20vs Sentilles/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesKevin Roedel / Kevin Gallimore vs John Sheahan / John Wilbourn3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid van Horn / Doug Wilson vs Stephen Karnes / Gordon Wills6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesWarwick Garner / John Castany vs David Boshers / Shawn Sentilles4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Kevin Roedel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Floriano Novoa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
David van Horn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Kevin Gallimore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Darrell Nephew
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Warwick Garner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
John Manshack
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
John Castany
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Glenn Neilson
published
2.81
Jim Brickell
published
barry puckett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Gallimore + Kevin Roedel404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Roedel
26W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Floriano Novoa
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
David van Horn
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Kevin Gallimore
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Darrell Nephew
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Warwick Garner
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
John Manshack
40W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
John Castany
11W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Glenn Neilson
17W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Jim Brickell
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
barry puckett
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.