Teams

LA - Queen Anne Blue

2023 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Men 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.07 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2023-12-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesBraxton Sato / David Mayer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-12-10vs LA - Sets on FireLost 01
L#2 DoublesBraxton Sato / David Mayer vs Aden Chen / Theodore Zhu3-6, 6-7
2023-12-09vs LA - Queen Anne KingsWon 10
W#3 DoublesBraxton Sato / David Mayer vs Nick Garfinkle / Jack Burton6-3, 7-5
2023-11-18vs LA - Court JusticeWon 10
W#2 DoublesBraxton Sato / David Mayer vs Philip Brooks / Luis Munoz6-4, 6-2
2023-11-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBraxton Sato / David Mayer vs George Armistead / Andres Arango5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2023-11-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Mayer / Braxton Sato vs Peter Choi / Josh Schoenwald5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-10-29vs LA - Griffin ClubWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Mayer / LeGeorge Mauldin vs Darren Finestone / Chris Abramson6-2, 6-1
2023-10-28vs LA - TriforcesLost 01
L#3 DoublesBraxton Sato / David Mayer vs Benjamin Kramer / Everjohn Feliciano3-6, 6-7
2023-10-21vs LA - LATCWon 10
W#3 DoublesBraxton Sato / David Mayer vs Michael Turrill / Brian Cheng7-6, 6-4
2023-10-14vs LA-LLW-Mulholland-Kamall ShaikhLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Mayer / Oscar Wong vs Andrew Brunswick / Eric Salat2-6, 2-6
2023-10-07vs LA - Social PariahsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Chon / David Mayer vs Tim Hughes / Robert Schwarzenbach6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Casey Reich
published 4
4.10
Bryan Hudson
published 4.5
3.80
David Mayer
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.72
Braxton Sato
published 4
3.53
Andrew Chon
published 4
3.52
Anil Punyapu
published 4
3.46
Daniel McDonald
published 4
Jeff Lorch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Braxton Sato + David Mayer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Casey Reich
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
4.10
4.5
Bryan Hudson
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.10
4
David Mayer
106W–67L career · 11 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Braxton Sato
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Andrew Chon
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Anil Punyapu
14W–16L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Daniel McDonald
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
Jeff Lorch
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.