Teams

Oaksmith - Over Served

2026 Howard Adult 18 & Over · Howard Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.91 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-06-07vs Tetrault - Spin-derellasSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Jo Roberton / Meaghan McHugh vs Skeeta Narciss / Jennifer Ivester6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRachael Mott / Beyza Akcam vs Janet Wu / Jill Rose0-6, 1-6
2026-06-02vs MacDonald - MacAttack 18+ 4.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Homberg / Mary Jo Roberton vs Tracy Flaherty / Janet Opar6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMeaghan McHugh / Elisa Oaksmith vs Julie Swartz / Stephanie Richards6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-05-17vs Celtnieks - Penn PalsWon 40
W#1 SinglesTina Halley vs Robin Burton6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Homberg / Meaghan McHugh vs Valerie Hicks / Shalen Fairbanks6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesBrooke Schetgen vs Sydney Anderson6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesElisa Oaksmith / Mary Jo Roberton vs Nancy Trimble / Margaret Asher6-4, 6-3
2026-05-15vs Tetrault - Spin-derellasLost 02
L#1 DoublesSamantha Gass / Lisa Scott vs Jennifer Exelby / Skeeta Narciss3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBeyza Akcam / Rachael Mott vs Eloise Grose / Jill Rose2-6, 1-6
2026-05-09vs Chung - Rally CatsWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Scott / Kristen Mahoney vs Taeeui Ham / Desiree Drakakis6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRachael Mott / Kate Dempsey vs Sanghee Lee / Miyuki Sato6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesColleen Knapp / Frances Sauer vs GENA CHUNG / Sung Cho6-3, 7-6
2026-05-05vs MacDonald - MacAttack 18+ 4.0Won 31
W#1 DoublesSamantha Gass / Mary Jo Roberton vs Cora Ho / Stephanie Richards6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesBrooke Schetgen vs Sarah Lawrence6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKate Dempsey / Susan Homberg vs Brooke Davidson / Stephanie Mackowiak6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesFrances Sauer / Colleen Knapp vs Tracy Flaherty / Janet Opar7-6, 5-3
2026-04-23vs Celtnieks - Penn PalsWon 21
W#2 DoublesSusan Homberg / Kristen Mahoney vs Mary Klyap / Danielle Gourdine2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBeyza Akcam vs Julia Heeter6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesElisa Oaksmith / Rachael Mott vs Denise Buch / Karen Keane3-6, 3-6
2026-04-18vs Tetrault - Spin-derellasWon 21
W#1 DoublesSamantha Gass / Margaret Dorsey vs Eloise Grose / Ruzica Ragontse4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Homberg / Kate Dempsey vs Ellen McLaughlin / Kathy Crowley7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesBeyza Akcam vs Katherine Fluharty0-6, 0-6
2026-04-12vs Chung - Rally CatsLost 13
L#1 DoublesLisa Scott / Jessica Walsh vs Zheng Dong / Esprit Cha2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesTina Halley vs Anna Shin6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBeyza Akcam / Rachael Mott vs Cathy Robertson / Sanghee Lee4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesFrances Sauer / Colleen Knapp vs GENA CHUNG / Linda Tsai6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-30vs MacDonald - MacAttack 18+ 4.0Won 41
W#1 DoublesSusan Homberg / Lisa Scott vs Brittany Muth / Stephanie Richards6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesBrooke Schetgen vs Sarah Lawrence3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Walsh / Rachael Mott vs Marina Goncharuk / Stephanie Mackowiak7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTina Halley vs Cintya Leveque6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesColleen Knapp / Kate Dempsey vs Maria Haslbeck / Melissa Lipple6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Meaghan McHugh
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.96
Samantha Gass
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Tina Halley
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.81
Mary Jo Roberton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Frances Sauer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Kate Dempsey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Susan Homberg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Brooke Schetgen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.63
Margaret Dorsey
published
3.63
Kristen Mahoney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Rachael Mott
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Jessica Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Beyza Akcam
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.36
Kerry Spicer
published
3.28
Lynn Gorman
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.20
Colleen Knapp
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
2.94
Elisa Oaksmith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samantha Gass + Mary Jo Roberton12367% games+5.3% vs expected
Beyza Akcam + Rachael Mott3842% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Meaghan McHugh
115W–75L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Samantha Gass
106W–61L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Tina Halley
128W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Mary Jo Roberton
144W–102L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Frances Sauer
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kate Dempsey
31W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Susan Homberg
75W–88L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Brooke Schetgen
70W–75L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.64
Margaret Dorsey
7W–12L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
Kristen Mahoney
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Rachael Mott
89W–126L career · 6 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.56
Jessica Walsh
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.44
4
Beyza Akcam
211W–250L career · 5 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
3.37
Kerry Spicer
3W–10L career · no lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.36
Lynn Gorman
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Colleen Knapp
71W–81L career · 10 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Elisa Oaksmith
2W–1L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.