Teams

FCCC

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

14 players · average NTRP 3.94 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-30vs TAGWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatti Helper / Amanda Repert vs Cheri Gipson / Helen Crews6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesApril Walden / Robin Bachelet vs Lyndsey Oates / Judy O'Gorman7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKELLY KHAN / Aileen VanMeveren vs Mary Wilson / Helen Dungan2-6, 6-7
2022-05-23vs CSU GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatti Helper / Amanda Repert vs Tonya Motley / Laurel McClellan7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDierdre Sadeh / Lynette Krueger vs Christine Houldsworth / Eileen Heath7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmy Anderson / April Walden vs Jan Keefe / Laura Powers6-2, 6-1
2022-05-16vs LVTALost 04
L#1 DoublesApril Walden / Lynette Krueger vs Paige Gilles / Sonda Huhta5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRobin Bachelet vs Cathy Graves3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Tynan / Patti Helper vs Carol Propst / Linda Miller2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesDierdre Sadeh vs Nancy Williams6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-05-09vs CSU GOLDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesRobin Bachelet / Lynette Krueger vs Priscilla Dressen / Lori Buderus4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAmanda Repert vs Kim Phillips3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesApril Walden / Amy Anderson vs Wendy Schaffer / Julie Walker3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDierdre Sadeh / KELLY KHAN vs Dee Woodcock / Jean Taaffe7-5, 6-4
2022-05-02vs HMTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesDierdre Sadeh / Robin Bachelet vs Erin Livingstone / Gail Draper2-6, 4-6
2022-04-25vs MLF PURPLELost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Anderson / April Walden vs Erin Hauser-Roe / Carrie Galyardt3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDierdre Sadeh / KELLY KHAN vs Susan Starr Nelson / Jaime Donnelly2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAileen VanMeveren vs Kristin Schams3-6, 1-6
2022-04-18vs MLF YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatti Helper / Dierdre Sadeh vs SeonAh Kendall / Cathy Thomas7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLynette Krueger / Robin Bachelet vs Melissa Seager / Lorena Laffitte6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelinda Blatt / Julia Tynan vs Taylor Montey / Jennifer Poznanovic6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Amanda Repert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.93
April Walden
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.79
Tracy Kerr
published
3.76
Patti Helper
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Julia Tynan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Dierdre Sadeh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.64
Robin Bachelet
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.50
Lynn Clay
published
3.47
Linda Abercrombie
published
3.34
Aileen VanMeveren
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Elaine Valenza
published 3.5
3.19
Melinda Blatt
published
KELLY KHAN
published
Lynette Krueger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Tynan + Aileen VanMeveren6262% games+10.3% vs expected
Patti Helper + April Walden331157% games+4.8% vs expected
Patti Helper + Amanda Repert10555% games+4.0% vs expected
April Walden + Amanda Repert10558% games+2.5% vs expected
Dierdre Sadeh + KELLY KHAN3355% games+2.2% vs expected
Dierdre Sadeh + Lynette Krueger6265% games+1.9% vs expected
Dierdre Sadeh + Robin Bachelet2547% games−0.5% vs expected
Dierdre Sadeh + Julia Tynan1451% games−3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amanda Repert
75W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
4
April Walden
102W–76L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.93
Tracy Kerr
37W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Patti Helper
70W–45L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Julia Tynan
84W–50L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Dierdre Sadeh
67W–86L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Robin Bachelet
56W–98L career · 5 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.64
Lynn Clay
17W–17L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
Linda Abercrombie
28W–44L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Aileen VanMeveren
85W–61L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Elaine Valenza
12W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Melinda Blatt
5W–14L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.19
KELLY KHAN
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynette Krueger
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.