Teams

LVC - Vahanian

2024 USTA 18 & Over League · 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.44 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-07-19vs Hempfield - Crush (Lingenfelter)Lost 14
L#1 DoublesAndrea Hamilton / Meg Rogers vs Andrea Reese / Brandi Tait3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Wilczek vs Summer Burkholder3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAylissa Tyndale / Kelly Miller vs Kristle Evans / Lauren Rettew4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAmy Wauhop vs Allie Lukridge6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Rowland / Lauren Goepfert vs KIM FRUIN / Cher Rineer4-6, 1-6
2024-07-13vs Hanover Raqueteers (Phillips)Lost 13
W#1 DoublesKelly Miller / Meg Rogers vs Karen Bream / Carolyn Cockey6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBecky Levenick vs Ella Knox2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesClaire Ray / Sarah Rowland vs Lucy Kane / Eva Hess Phillips0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAmy Wauhop vs Molly Socks3-6, 3-6
2024-07-01vs Hershey Wildcats - BrummelLost 14
L#1 DoublesCatherine Shaak / Becky Levenick vs Geralyn Umstead-Singer / Kristin Jeffries1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Wilczek vs Melanie Mathews1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKristy Hansen / Meg Rogers vs Diane Eshelman / Lisa Torchia6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSarah Rowland vs Alivia Serenita5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTara Wolfe / Angela Peirce vs Bagavathy Chockalingam / Elesia Heimbecker0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-29vs RCW- String Courtettes (Nolt)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesTara Wolfe / Angela Peirce vs Laura Ramos-Sepulveda / Ginny Thomas3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesNoelle Vahanian vs Kristy Almoney6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Miller / Sarah Rowland vs Jill Hauck / Duffy Johnson5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMelissa Stabley vs Jen Weber7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-22vs Wisehaven - TaylorWon 21
W#1 DoublesBecky Levenick / Noelle Vahanian vs JODI SULPIZIO / Jennifer Small6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAndrea Hamilton vs Allegra Elim6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAmy Wauhop / Aylissa Tyndale vs Annie Stich / Michelle Webb7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-15vs Hempfield-Hangen18Lost 13
W#1 DoublesBecky Levenick / Emily Wilczek vs Brenda Crosetto / Jennifer Graham1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMeg Rogers vs Andrea Holder4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Peirce / Tara Wolfe vs Kristine Johnston / Rebecca Durrett7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKristy Hansen / Amy Wauhop vs Emily Louie / Sandra Crespo6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2024-06-08vs Lanc CC - BetteridgeWon 40
W#1 DoublesBecky Levenick / Meg Rogers vs Julie Fulton / Mary Beth Filling6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNoelle Vahanian vs Lindsay Powers6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAndrea Hamilton / Kristy Hansen vs Julia Levering / Rebekah Landis6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAngela Peirce / Tara Wolfe vs Courtney Mallon / Carol Lefever6-1, 6-2
2024-06-01vs Hempfield - CriswellLost 05
L#1 DoublesCatherine Shaak / Noelle Vahanian vs Louise Manzella / Aneesa Malik2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAndrea Hamilton vs Brianna Serruto6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Goepfert / Meg Rogers vs Vy Banh / Bonnie Weaver3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesEmily Wilczek vs Alyssa Good1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Peirce / Tara Wolfe vs Lisa Frick / Janet Krusen3-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesMelissa Stabley / Kristy Hansen vs Nicole Gash / Kristie Teets2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMeg Rogers vs Olivia Rindfuss6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesClaire Ray / Kelly Miller vs Toni Tokarz / Elizabeth Filipovich3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesEmily Wilczek vs Anna Jacobs0-6, 0-6
2024-05-19vs Carlisle - Net Ninjas (Tiley)Lost 23
L#1 DoublesAngela Peirce / Tara Wolfe vs Dara Kluger / Amy Spangler7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNoelle Vahanian vs Brooke Lininger6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMelissa Stabley / Lauren Goepfert vs Beth McCrea / Gretchen Svitko3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAndrea Hamilton vs Holly Willow6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Miller / Sarah Rowland vs Hayley Caruso / Emily Simpson6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hanover Raqueteers (Phillips)010381232335
2Hempfield - Criswell010311942384
3RCW- String Courtettes (Nolt)010311947413
4Hempfield - Crush (Lingenfelter)010282252439
5Hbg Academy - Lucky Ladies (Zeigler)010272355455
6Hempfield-Hangen18010272355468
7Hershey Wildcats - Brummel010193167483
8Carlisle - Net Ninjas (Tiley)010173371481
9LVC - Vahanian010153578516

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Noelle Vahanian
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.44
Becky Levenick
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.26
Kristy Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Andrea Hamilton
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Emily Wilczek
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Catherine Shaak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Amy Wauhop
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Angela Peirce
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Sarah Rowland
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.76
Claire Ray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.74
Aylissa Tyndale
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Lauren Goepfert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Meg Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Melissa Stabley
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tara Wolfe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Hamilton + Kristy Hansen161055% games+8.2% vs expected
Tara Wolfe + Angela Peirce151552% games+3.7% vs expected
Amy Wauhop + Claire Ray5551% games−2.6% vs expected
Amy Wauhop + Kristy Hansen2547% games−3.6% vs expected
Aylissa Tyndale + Noelle Vahanian7455% games−5.9% vs expected
Aylissa Tyndale + Becky Levenick3544% games−9.9% vs expected
Noelle Vahanian + Becky Levenick8168% gamesnot enough data
Claire Ray + Andrea Hamilton6358% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Noelle Vahanian
156W–122L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Becky Levenick
118W–67L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
Kristy Hansen
55W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Andrea Hamilton
67W–50L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Emily Wilczek
3W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Catherine Shaak
147W–110L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Amy Wauhop
71W–73L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Angela Peirce
90W–67L career · 6 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.16
Sarah Rowland
35W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.94
3.5
Claire Ray
98W–102L career · 2 lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.76
3
Aylissa Tyndale
43W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
Lauren Goepfert
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Meg Rogers
116W–76L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Stabley
11W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tara Wolfe
49W–38L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.