Teams

LOCH.Kasberg

2025 CTRL Tri-Level 40 & Over · Tri-Level 40 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-04vs TOC.YadavLost 01
L#2 DoublesBob Cwikla / Daryn Watson vs Ajit Shankardas / Steven Harris1-6, 1-6
2025-07-23vs TOC.HariharanLost 01
L#3 DoublesBob Cwikla / Tom Broslawsky vs Tom Luben / Christopher DeFusco0-6, 0-6
2025-07-13vs PW.HaywardLost 01
L#2 DoublesBob Cwikla / Daryn Watson vs Ariel Edery / Marc Hastings4-6, 2-6
2025-07-12vs TOC.YadavLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaryn Watson / Bob Cwikla vs Shiv Giri / Ajit Shankardas3-6, 6-7
2025-06-29vs TOC.KalluruSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAdam Coleman / Daryn Watson vs Seshagiri Kalluru / Eslam Soliman0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMark Wolff / Bob Cwikla vs Akshat Mathur / Anish Arya7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-06-19vs TOC.HariharanLost 02
L#2 DoublesDaryn Watson / Charles Newsome vs Rishi Tandon / Vamsee Pasangulapati4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKeith Kasberg / Bob Cwikla vs Neeraj Singh / Tom Luben0-6, 1-6
2025-06-08vs PW.HaywardLost 02
L#2 DoublesCharles Newsome / Daryn Watson vs John Kruszewski / Kevin Fitzgerald3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMark Wolff / Bob Cwikla vs Colin Hayward / Jason Belyew3-6, 1-6
2025-05-25vs TOC.KalluruLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaryn Watson / Eric Weber vs Eslam Soliman / Rajshekar Chandraprakash1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 40 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
3.48
Pedro Torrejon
published
3.11
Daryn Watson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Charles Newsome
published 3.5
2.84
Bob Cwikla
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.79
Mark Wolff
published
2.65
Keith Kasberg
published
2.52
John Mcalpin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daryn Watson + Bob Cwikla2442% gamesnot enough data
Keith Kasberg + John Mcalpin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Enric Prat Codina
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Pedro Torrejon
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Daryn Watson
36W–80L career · 7 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Charles Newsome
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Bob Cwikla
40W–60L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
Mark Wolff
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
Keith Kasberg
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
2.65
John Mcalpin
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.