Teams

ROUND HILL CC 18AM3.5B

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-17vs MORAGA VALLEY 18AM3.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesTim van der Waart van Gulik / Charles Peloquin vs Charles Hearey / Keyvan Berenjian6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHector Vizcarrondo / Jeffrey Nipp vs Kyle Steinpress / Chris Terril6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Gilchrist / Jeffrey Nornhold vs David Cherry / Wen Chen7-5, 6-2
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Nipp / Yuri Veber vs Velmurugan Subramanian / Kanagasabapathi Balasubramanian4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTim van der Waart van Gulik vs Abdul Rahim7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Nornhold / Ryan Zarnegar vs Sundar Thirumalai / Laks Varathan5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKen Haworth / John Gilchrist vs Ashok Talluru / Mohan Kumar Nadaraj Sivasubramaniam2-6, 1-6
2025-05-04vs MORAGA VALLEY 18AM3.5AWon 21
L#1 DoublesJohn Foster / Hector Vizcarrondo vs Jeff Feintuck / Andrew Barnette6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTim van der Waart van Gulik vs Kyle Steinpress6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGreg Raupp / Jeffrey Nornhold vs Lukas Kost / Wen Chen6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Yuri Veber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Tim van der Waart van Gulik
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Greg Raupp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Charles Peloquin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
James Lacey
published
3.23
Jeffrey Nornhold
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Jeffrey Nipp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Ken Haworth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Hector Vizcarrondo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Ricardo Angel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Nornhold + Greg Raupp3257% games+11.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yuri Veber
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Tim van der Waart van Gulik
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Greg Raupp
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Charles Peloquin
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
James Lacey
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jeffrey Nornhold
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jeffrey Nipp
8W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Ken Haworth
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Hector Vizcarrondo
4W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Ricardo Angel
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.