Teams

PBTC HENSON

2024 ITA MIXED - SOCO · MIXED 7.5 - ITA - SOCO

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-18vs GOG GLASERWon 10
W#2 DoublesDerek Vidmar / Emily Vidmar vs Theresa Watson / Jason Carter6-3, 7-5
2024-08-11vs CCW WOLFELost 01
L#3 DoublesDeidra Roque / Michael Herzog vs Lance McClelland / Shara Wolfe3-6, 4-6
2024-08-04vs LTFCS KALEOLost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Vidmar / Derek Vidmar vs Beth Spargo / Rob Wilson0-6, 0-6
2024-07-28vs CSRC WHITELost 01
L#1 DoublesDeidra Roque / Robert DeVine vs Jarek Markley / Olivia Salmon4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-07-21vs CCW YOUNGLost 01
L#1 DoublesRalf Weizenbeck / Nichol Weizenbeck vs John Whipple / Tracy Slater0-6, 1-6
2024-07-14vs MEMPK CARPENTERLost 01
L#2 DoublesChris Roman / Emily Vidmar vs DARLENE WARMOUTH / Zachary Carpenter7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.5 - ITA - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Chris Roman
published 4
3.78
Ralf Weizenbeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Deidra Roque
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.45
Michael Fipps
published
3.45
Emily Vidmar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Lynette di Stasio
published
3.36
Michael Herzog
published
3.26
Robert DeVine
published
3.10
DeAnn Fipps
published 3.5
3.04
Nichol Weizenbeck
published 3.5
Michael di Stasio
published
Paula Henson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ralf Weizenbeck + Nichol Weizenbeck4946% games−1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Roman
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Ralf Weizenbeck
40W–57L career · 1 line in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Deidra Roque
31W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.75
Michael Fipps
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Emily Vidmar
71W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.45
Lynette di Stasio
11W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.43
Michael Herzog
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
Robert DeVine
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
DeAnn Fipps
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Nichol Weizenbeck
35W–46L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.04
Michael di Stasio
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Paula Henson
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.