Teams

Warner

2022 Leon Adult 18 & Over · 4.0W Adult 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-17vs KjellerupWon 21
L#2 DoublesMichelle Eubanks / Stacy Chick vs Marie Go / Xiaobing Zhang6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJennifer Britt vs Lori Elliott6-1, 4-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Franson / Jasmine Adams vs Melissa Johnson / Kim Thriffiley6-3, 7-6
2022-07-14vs KjellerupSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichelle Eubanks / Mary Warner vs Gina Herring / Kim Thriffiley6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJasmine Adams vs Fang Liang2-6, 4-6
2022-07-06vs BahorskiLost 12
W#1 SinglesJennifer Britt vs Aimee Lim6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJasmine Adams vs Jessica Bahorski2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Eubanks / Stacy Chick vs Elizabeth Hawkins / Jennifer Winegardner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-22vs BahorskiWon 20
W#1 DoublesStacy Chick / Michelle Eubanks vs Kathy Beggs / Elizabeth Hawkins6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJennifer Britt vs Jessica Bahorski6-4, 6-1
2022-06-20vs KjellerupLost 12
L#2 DoublesStacy Chick / Jasmine Adams vs Susan Goodwin / Gina Herring6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJennifer Britt vs Melissa Jaacks6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSarah Henson / Michelle Eubanks vs Xiaobing Zhang / Marie Go6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-05-19vs KjellerupWon 20
W#2 DoublesMichelle Eubanks / Jennifer Britt vs Sherry Cady / Susan Goodwin6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJasmine Adams vs Fang Liang3-6
2022-05-12vs BahorskiLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Eubanks / Stacy Chick vs Cathy Kendall / Pia Lehtonen4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJasmine Adams vs Jessica Bahorski5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Warner / Jennifer Britt vs Elizabeth Murray / Pinfang Xu4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W Adult 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Jennifer Britt
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.71
Lisa Graganella
published
3.64
Stacy Chick
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.64
Michelle Eubanks
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.60
Lisa Franson
published
3.58
Amy Otis
published 4
3.31
Jasmine Adams
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.28
Anna Jones
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Chick + Michelle Eubanks432852% games−5.8% vs expected
Jennifer Britt + Michelle Eubanks303 matchesnot enough data
Anna Jones + Lisa Graganella303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Britt
111W–44L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Lisa Graganella
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Stacy Chick
59W–50L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Michelle Eubanks
157W–99L career · 7 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
Lisa Franson
31W–24L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Amy Otis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Jasmine Adams
31W–35L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
4
Anna Jones
8W–1L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.