Teams

David Park- Loren

2023 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Fall Day · 4.0 Women

19 players · average NTRP 4.08 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-15vs Veltri - YonghongWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatherine Shadid / Kristen Sloan vs Renata de Agostini George / Susan Spring6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLoren Levine / Mirella Sprinckmoller vs Gabriella Vayshelboym / Maria Schaeuffler6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesConnie Rivera / Upasna Jha vs Roberta Kruta / Jovette Levine6-0, 3-1
2022-12-08vs winner - Veltri/KoonWon 21
W#1 DoublesUpasna Jha / Hania Majzoub vs Gloria Coursey / Clarena Furtado6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKatherine Shadid / Paulina Carney vs Patricia Guest / Christine Holcomb6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMichele King / Lee Lynott vs Estefania Lacoa / Lorena Villar5-7, 2-6
2022-12-07vs Veltri - SaraWon 20
W#2 DoublesMirella Sprinckmoller / Kristen Sloan vs Paulina Riveros / ELIZABETH GORDILLO2-2
W#2 SinglesLoren Levine vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-11-17vs Parkland - DanaWon 20
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Cheryl Bonno6-1, 2-0
W#2 DoublesPaulina Carney / Loren Levine vs Judy Thomas / Trisha Dugan6-0, 6-2
2022-11-10vs Veltri - YonghongLost 01
L#3 DoublesBea Tully / Svetlana Janglin vs Jeanne Wickwire / Yonghong Chen3-6, 4-6
2022-10-27vs winner - Veltri/KoonLost 12
L#1 DoublesLoren Levine / Michele King vs Kathy Koon / Ivy Touchstone5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElena Sise / Lori Schlam vs Clarena Furtado / Gloria Coursey6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesUpasna Jha / Hania Majzoub vs Vladlena Funk / Lorena Villar6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-10-26vs Parkland - DanaWon 21
L#1 DoublesUpasna Jha / Maria Moreno vs Ashley Cohn / Kris Black5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichele King / Lee Lynott vs Cheryl Bonno / Maria Brozzi6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesElena Sise / Katherine Shadid vs Judy Thomas / Karen Daum6-2, 6-3
2022-10-20vs Veltri - SaraWon 20
W#1 DoublesBea Tully / Svetlana Janglin vs Paulina Riveros / ELIZABETH GORDILLO3-0
W#2 DoublesPaulina Carney / Mirella Sprinckmoller vs Natalia Frantsevskaya / Zorayda Hidalgo1-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Paulina Carney
published
4.03
Elena Sise
published 4.5
4.03
Hania Majzoub
published 4.5
4.03
Michele King
published
3.96
Lori Schlam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Edith Schmidt
published 4
3.85
Katherine Shadid
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Amy DeLoach
published 4
3.82
Upasna Jha
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Svetlana Janglin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Wendy Sosa
published
3.72
Mirella Sprinckmoller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Loren Levine
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
Catherine Land
published 4
3.61
Maria Moreno
published
3.50
Bea Tully
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.45
Carla Martin
published 4
3.29
Lee Lynott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tatiana Roosli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mirella Sprinckmoller + Edith Schmidt6060% games+6.6% vs expected
Loren Levine + Edith Schmidt6357% games−3.2% vs expected
Katherine Shadid + Mirella Sprinckmoller3256% gamesnot enough data
Loren Levine + Mirella Sprinckmoller2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paulina Carney
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
4.07
4.5
Elena Sise
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
4.03
4.5
Hania Majzoub
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
Michele King
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
Lori Schlam
45W–14L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Edith Schmidt
52W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Katherine Shadid
84W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Amy DeLoach
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Upasna Jha
204W–119L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Svetlana Janglin
98W–111L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Wendy Sosa
16W–22L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Mirella Sprinckmoller
76W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Loren Levine
246W–175L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Catherine Land
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
Maria Moreno
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.61
4
Bea Tully
30W–93L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Carla Martin
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.45
Lee Lynott
80W–59L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
Tatiana Roosli
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.