Teams

RCC GREEN

2024 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-27vs NJ ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesChrissy Hasek / Tayrien Holocher vs Kristin Walters / Heather Young6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCindy Hickler / Kirsten Coppo vs Laura Kelly / Lisa Kellogg1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-20vs LTA-Q GREENWon 20
W#1 SinglesJennifer Gorrell vs Melissa Karch6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPam Zaeske / Kirsten Coppo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-13vs BRMST TEALWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatricia Sato / Jennifer Gorrell vs Kelly Horace / Christine Everson6-0, 6-3
2024-04-06vs CVTA REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesChrissy Hasek / Pam Zaeske vs Sarah Downey / Lakshmi Vegesna4-6, 2-6
2024-03-30vs BRMST GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Gorrell / Karen Coyle vs Michele Martin / Susan Cave6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJaime Grantham vs Lisa Shaver6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRilla Baca / Kirsten Coppo vs Lori Claussen / Karen Gallo4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Jaime Grantham
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Jennifer Gorrell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Tayrien Holocher
published 3.5
3.00
Chrissy Hasek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Cindy Hickler
published 3
2.68
Rilla Baca
published
2.67
Kirsten Coppo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jacquelynn Johnson
published
Pam Zaeske
published
Patricia Sato
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kirsten Coppo + Chrissy Hasek2344% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jaime Grantham
53W–25L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Jennifer Gorrell
108W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Tayrien Holocher
39W–16L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.19
3
Chrissy Hasek
85W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Cindy Hickler
6W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
Rilla Baca
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Kirsten Coppo
48W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.67
Jacquelynn Johnson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Pam Zaeske
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Sato
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.