Teams

Ardsley CC

2023 18&Over Women · 2.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-10vs Club Fit Briarcliff Tuf Luv LiteWon 10
W#2 DoublesBeth Levinsin / Natasha Corio vs Danielle Weisberg / Cathryn Devons6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2023-06-26vs Life Time GarnetWon 20
W#1 DoublesJanet Krzemienski / Barbara Trencher vs Angela Telles / Cari Mermelstein5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEmily Clinton vs Axi Choi6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEmily Clinton vs Martine Broeders6-3, 6-4
2023-06-05vs Sleepy Hollow: Sleep and RallyWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Krzemienski / Emily Clinton vs Sabrina Kilpatrick / Jesse Waldele6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMarci Ponagai vs Eliza Savage2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Trencher / Natasha Corio vs Meghan Boland / Caitlin Scheir4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesBarbara Trencher / Kimberly Hogan vs Jennifer Lobato-Church / Lisa Fragner6-1, 6-3
2023-05-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesBarbara Trencher / Beth Levinsin vs Jennifer Spencer / Celia Guerra6-2, 6-4
2023-05-01vs Life Time GarnetWon 20
W#1 SinglesEmily Clinton vs Angela Telles6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaurissa Michael / Marci Ponagai vs Kim MacRi / Ilene McNulty6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesBarbara Trencher / Lisa Wade vs Ellen Brower / Claudiane O'Mara5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEmily Clinton vs Carla Zambri6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarci Ponagai / Kimberly Hogan vs Karen McCarthy / Nicole Masi0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Aisha Walker
published 3
Barbara Trencher
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Debbie Cohn
published 3
2.56
Emily Clinton
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.52
Natasha Corio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.05
Marci Ponagai
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Kimberly Hogan
published
Laurissa Michael
published
Lisa Wade
published
Rebecca Waldman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Cohn + Lisa Wade033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Aisha Walker
3W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Allison Forstmann
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Barbara Trencher
27W–10L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Debbie Cohn
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Emily Clinton
19W–35L career · 5 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
2.56
Natasha Corio
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.52
Marci Ponagai
18W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Kimberly Hogan
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laurissa Michael
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Wade
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Waldman
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.