Teams

MAC Wallace/Holland

2025 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 8.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.39 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-16vs SCC Zima/Lineberger 8.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesLindsay Hardage / Alex Neuwelt vs Richard Lloyd / Sarah Capozello6-1, 7-5
2025-11-01vs MRTC Williams 8.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPearl Horng / Alex Neuwelt vs Shelley Morris / Wayne Motley4-6, 2-6
2025-10-26vs Westwood - Kelly 8.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLindsay Hardage / Adam Hamilton vs Lauren Jones / Dale Nowery3-6, 4-6
2025-10-19vs Belmont Ruth Combo Mixed 8.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesSung Kang / Lindsay Hardage vs Stuart Fulcher / Michelle Holmes7-5, 6-4
2025-10-04vs Burkwood Sinsabaugh 8.5 MixWon 10
W#1 DoublesLara Hansen / Sung Kang vs Erin Decker / Adam Decker7-6, 6-3
2025-09-28vs SCC Zima/Lineberger 8.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAlex Neuwelt / Lindsay Hardage vs Jay Nelson / Radhika Thorn3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.70
Jamie Cochrane
published 5
4.28
Rebecca Haener
published
4.22
Bradley Snyder
published 4.5
4.19
Sung Kang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Adam Hamilton
published 4.5
4.05
Alex Neuwelt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.89
Carol Gregory
published 4.5
3.87
Don Busick
published 4
3.85
James Holland
published 4
3.84
Jonathan McDorman
published
3.81
Lindsay Hardage
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.80
Keith Adams
published
3.79
Pearl Horng
published
3.77
Lara Hansen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lara Hansen + James Holland404 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Hardage + Don Busick213 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Haener + Adam Hamilton033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jamie Cochrane
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.70
Rebecca Haener
17W–17L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Bradley Snyder
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Sung Kang
202W–85L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Adam Hamilton
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Alex Neuwelt
260W–119L career · 6 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Carol Gregory
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.89
4
Don Busick
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
James Holland
28W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.85
Jonathan McDorman
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Lindsay Hardage
94W–63L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Keith Adams
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.80
Pearl Horng
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
Lara Hansen
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.