Teams

Seay/Park-Margolis W3.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

18 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-06-20vs Bent Tree/Wilder W3.5SLost 01
L#3 DoublesKatie Campbell / Rebecca Heller vs Jessica Aultz / Abigail Rogers6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2026-06-13vs Greenhill/Sanders W3.5SWon 20
W#1 SinglesRennie Vandermeer vs Ana Goridkov6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMonica Knake / Rebecca Heller vs Julia Promnitz / Anna Belou4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-30Split 11
W#1 SinglesRennie Vandermeer vs Anna Dirickson6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJennifer Calhoun vs Barbara Thompson0-6, 0-6
2026-05-16vs LB Houston/O'Brien W3.5SWon 20
W#1 SinglesRennie Vandermeer vs Ze Song6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Calhoun / Lindsey Wilson vs Nicole Peer / Emily Selby6-4, 6-4
2026-05-02vs Chandlers Landing/Campbell W3.5SLost 02
L#2 SinglesOlivia Tite vs Catherine Kumar0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Dean / Stefanie Miles vs Barbara Hanks / Colleen Miller2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Karen Saland
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.45
Lindsey Hutchinson
usually #2 Singles 46%, also #1 Singles 36% · published
3.26
Eimear May
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Monica Knake
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.23
Natalie Sorrell
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Laurie Bracy
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Karla Baumgartner
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #1 Singles 44% · published
3.10
Jennifer Calhoun
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.06
Rebecca Heller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Mary Simons
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Elizabeth Dean
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Singles 44% · published
Erika Burton
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Miriam Spradling
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Olivia Tite
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Rennie Vandermeer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Stefanie Miles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tongula Steddum
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Weezie Margolis
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Saland
11W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Lindsey Hutchinson
26W–10L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Eimear May
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
Monica Knake
17W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Natalie Sorrell
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Laurie Bracy
4W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Karla Baumgartner
11W–22L career · 9 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jennifer Calhoun
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Rebecca Heller
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.06
Mary Simons
18W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
2.90
Elizabeth Dean
9W–3L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Erika Burton
4W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Miriam Spradling
6W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Olivia Tite
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rennie Vandermeer
8W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stefanie Miles
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Tongula Steddum
6W–4L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Weezie Margolis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.