Teams

SLMPA-Paul/Jetton 18+ Men 3.0

Lake USTA 18 & Over Summer Singles · 3.0 Men Mon PM 18+ Singles

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#2 SinglesGian Sarolli vs Rick Lazes6-1, 7-5
L#3 SinglesAlan Henderson vs Will Hapeman1-6, 1-6
2026-07-27vs SLAFE-Feinberg/Bailey AcesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJustin Murphy vs lan huynh6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesMark Paul vs Rikus Goosen0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesGian Sarolli vs Harrell Solomon1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesRocky Pavkov vs Al Solis6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJustin Murphy vs Will Hapeman2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAlan Henderson vs Noah Kohl0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMark Paul vs Drew Porcello0-6, 2-6
2026-06-30vs SLAFE-Feinberg/Bailey AcesSplit 11
L#2 SinglesSal Pulla vs Toan Nguyen0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesBrad Morris vs lan huynh6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-29vs SLAFE-Feinberg/Bailey AcesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRocky Pavkov vs Toan Nguyen2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesBrad Morris vs Neil McLean5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAlan Henderson vs Al Solis1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMark Paul vs Steve Lawson3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesGian Sarolli vs Will Hapeman2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesRocky Pavkov vs Rick Lazes6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesBrad Morris vs Noah Kohl0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBrad Morris vs Walter Rodriguez0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRocky Pavkov vs Jeff Campbell3-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesMark Paul vs Harrell Solomon3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Men Mon PM 18+ Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SLAFE-Feinberg/Bailey Aces63161126213
2SLMPA-Paul/Jetton 18+ Men 3.054121536253
3SLSYI-Yin/Bailey 18+ 3.0 Mon pm singles45151225203
4SLNKO-KOHL/NMP Singles 18+ 3.0 Monday pm36111633235

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Justin Murphy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.81
Rocky Pavkov
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.75
Mark Paul
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.75
Brad Morris
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.58
Alan Henderson
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.46
Sal Pulla
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.32
Gian Sarolli
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Justin Murphy
31W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
Rocky Pavkov
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
Mark Paul
6W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Brad Morris
4W–13L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Alan Henderson
1W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Sal Pulla
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.46
2.5
Gian Sarolli
22W–51L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.