Teams

NRYC 3.0 Marynowitz

2025 Tuscaloosa USTA Adult Fall-Weekday 18&over · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.12 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-20vs IHCC 3.0 Fall PruettLost 03
L#1 DoublesJanie Ellis / Pasquale Tosyali vs Lindsay Lee / Kara Warr4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Collins / Kacie Spruill vs Frances Pruett / Blakely Blakeney6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMeagan Randall / Lindsey White vs Sarah Partlow / Leesa Hollowell1-6, 3-6
2024-11-18vs IHCC 3.0 Fall PruettLost 03
L#1 DoublesPasquale Tosyali / Kacie Spruill vs Olivia Bradford / Kara Warr3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCodie Marynowitz / Meagan Randall vs Natalie Carruth / Laurie Beth Gilmore6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMclean Wilhite / Mary Jane Meyer vs Leesa Hollowell / Rene Sheffield2-6, 3-6
2024-11-15vs IHCC 3.0 Fall PruettLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaria Murphy / Ines de Urtubey vs Lindsay Lee / Sage Hickman4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHolly Collins / Jill Oswalt vs Frances Pruett / Rene Sheffield3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCodie Marynowitz / Janie Ellis vs Laurie Beth Gilmore / Leigh Killian6-0, 6-0
2024-11-04vs IHCC 3.0 Fall PruettLost 13
W#1 DoublesInes de Urtubey / Janie Ellis vs Frances Pruett / Lindsay Lee6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKacie Spruill vs Kara Warr5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCodie Marynowitz / Pasquale Tosyali vs Leesa Hollowell / Blakely Blakeney6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMeagan Randall / Lindsey White vs Natalie Carruth / Sarah Partlow2-6, 1-6
2024-10-28vs IHCC 3.0 Fall PruettLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaria Murphy / Hailey Howell vs Lindsay Lee / Sage Hickman1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary Jane Meyer / Mclean Wilhite vs Laurie Beth Gilmore / Rene Sheffield1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHolly Collins / Jill Oswalt vs Frances Pruett / Leesa Hollowell4-6, 1-6
2024-10-21vs IHCC 3.0 Fall PruettLost 13
W#1 DoublesInes de Urtubey / Janie Ellis vs Kara Warr / Blakely Blakeney6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesPasquale Tosyali vs Olivia Bradford0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCodie Marynowitz / Meagan Randall vs Sarah Partlow / Caroline Williams6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMclean Wilhite / Holly Collins vs Leesa Hollowell / Rene Sheffield7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-14vs IHCC 3.0 Fall PruettWon 21
W#1 DoublesCodie Marynowitz / Janie Ellis vs Blakely Blakeney / Laurie Beth Gilmore4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHailey Howell / Kacie Spruill vs Frances Pruett / Kara Warr7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesInes de Urtubey / Meagan Randall vs Leigh Killian / Rene Sheffield6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Ines de Urtubey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Janie Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.93
Holly Collins
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Hailey Howell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Pasquale Tosyali
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.73
Codie Marynowitz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.50
Mclean Wilhite
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.15
Meagan Randall
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.07
Jill Oswalt
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
1.95
Lindsey White
published
Kacie Spruill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Maria Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Jane Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janie Ellis + Codie Marynowitz2350% games−1.3% vs expected
Codie Marynowitz + Meagan Randall1437% games−4.8% vs expected
Janie Ellis + Ines de Urtubey404 matchesnot enough data
Codie Marynowitz + Hailey Howell123 matchesnot enough data
Jill Oswalt + Holly Collins033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ines de Urtubey
27W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
Janie Ellis
38W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Holly Collins
44W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Hailey Howell
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Pasquale Tosyali
20W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Codie Marynowitz
8W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Mclean Wilhite
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Meagan Randall
9W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Jill Oswalt
9W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Lindsey White
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Kacie Spruill
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria Murphy
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Jane Meyer
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.