Teams

Azario Sugar, Spice & a little Slice

2025 Sarasota Combo 50 & Over Fall · 7.5 W Wednesday

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-19vs Sarasota/Romano/50&Over7.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Ritchey / Helene Gold vs Jackie Lester / Nichole Bontell0-6, 5-7
2025-11-12Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLeticia Baldwin / Katie Scarfone vs Christie Stephenson / Annmarie Curle0-6, 1-6
2025-10-29vs Sarasota/Ross 7.5 50+Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Ritchey / Kimberly Levy vs Elizabeth Micek / Marsha Timm3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLeticia Baldwin / Deborah Hurd vs Carola Ross / Fabiola Beckmann2-6, 0-6
2025-10-22vs LWR Fall Ranch RacqueteersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Ritchey / Courtney Smith vs Martina Kralickova / Claudia Kelly6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKimberly Levy / Leticia Baldwin vs Beth Hill / Karen Spiegel1-6, 0-6
2025-10-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeticia Baldwin / Jacqueline Ritchey vs Krista Sprungman / Celia Pena4-6, 2-6
2025-10-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Ritchey / Leticia Baldwin vs Julie Pipes / Christen Tooley1-6, 2-6
2025-09-24Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Ritchey / Kimberly Levy vs Deanna Rollyson / Nancy Smith5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Zerkle / Leticia Baldwin vs Diana Trivax Levy / Faye Blakely1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Courtney Smith
published 3.5
3.48
Jacqueline Ritchey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.08
Helene Gold
published 3.5
2.93
Deborah Hurd
published 3.5
Jill Shortal
published
Karen Zerkle
published
Katie Scarfone
published
Kimberly Levy
published
Leticia Baldwin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Suzanne Fitzpatrick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Shortal + Katie Scarfone123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Courtney Smith
46W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.60
4
Jacqueline Ritchey
43W–58L career · 6 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Helene Gold
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Deborah Hurd
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.93
Jill Shortal
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Zerkle
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Scarfone
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Levy
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leticia Baldwin
5W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Fitzpatrick
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.