Teams

Sa.Kane18S3.0

2026 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-22vs Cl.Duff18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesKasani Amore vs Sarah Newton7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesEllina Max vs Sally Page0-6, 3-6
2026-07-15vs Em.Rubin18SLost 03
L#1 SinglesKasani Amore vs Katie Dickerson4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesEmily Sandifer vs Laura Panebianco6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesLauren Kane vs Emily Rubin1-6, 0-6
2026-07-13vs Na.Ivey18SLost 12
L#1 SinglesShannon Vinson vs Heather Sherwood2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKasani Amore vs Sarah Powers6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesMelis Hamevi Bukey vs Natalie Rodriguez1-6, 2-6
2026-07-01vs Je.Jones18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEllina Max vs Michaela DeSoucey6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesShannon Vinson vs Beth Stagner3-6, 1-6
2026-06-24vs Sa.BrodyMoses18SLost 02
L#2 SinglesLauren Kane vs Bridget Whalen7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 SinglesEmily Sandifer vs Samantha Brody Moses0-6, 4-6
2026-06-17vs Th.Roschel18SLost 03
L#1 SinglesEmily Sandifer vs Stephanie Williams4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLauren Kane vs Jessica Tyndall1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesMelis Hamevi Bukey vs Anne Newton0-6, 1-6
2026-06-10vs Ke.O'Rourke18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEllina Max vs Maggie Clark6-7
L#3 SinglesMelis Hamevi Bukey vs Kelly O'Rourke2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Je.Jones18S7016513160
2Ly.Summitt18S7119513169
3Ma.Basil18S7117717181
4Me.Campbell18S5213819154
5Th.Roschel18S5213819162
6Cl.Duff18S5212920174
7Be.Pegram18S53141024204
8St.Styers18S53121230224
9Em.Rubin18S4314715146
10Ta.Yasin18S3.034111021171
11Na.Ivey18S34101123178
12Ca.Wilborne18S35121226208
13Sa.BrodyMoses18S2591226206
14El.Schacht18S2671735240
15St.Fogarty18S2651940250
16Ke.O'Rourke18S1661534219
17Sa.Kane18S3.01641736228
18Ca.Aden18S0871734236

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Kasani Amore
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.84
Sabrina Kane
published 3
2.56
Ellina Max
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.51
Shannon Vinson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.46
Emily Sandifer
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.38
Lauren Kane
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.21
Melis Hamevi Bukey
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kasani Amore
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Sabrina Kane
248W–175L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Ellina Max
59W–61L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.56
Shannon Vinson
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
Emily Sandifer
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.46
Lauren Kane
19W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
Melis Hamevi Bukey
0W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
2.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.