Teams

HOA/Johnson/18&over6.0X

2025 Adult Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 - 10.0 · 6.0 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-08vs Courtney, MaggieSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJamie Greber / Sean Kalic vs Emma Torgerson / Lorry Nelson1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMatthew Reid / Olena Reid vs Ken Riggins / Teresa Riggins6-0, 6-4
2025-08-07vs Hawkey, SummerWon 21
W#1 DoublesMariko Johnson / Mitch Klingenberg vs Thomas Brown / Krissi Wagner6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJamie Greber / Sean Kalic vs Melanie Beck / David Beck6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesOlena Reid / Matthew Reid vs Summer Hawkey / Dustin Sherbert5-7, 4-2, 1-0
2025-08-05vs Courtney, MaggieWon 21
W#1 DoublesMegan Mikel / Wes Mikel vs Marion Ritter / James Henry6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKendall Kaut / Taylor Hines vs Teresa Riggins / Ken Riggins6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJamie Greber / Jason Norberg vs Ardis Englezos / Luke Garrison6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-01vs Pattabiraman, KarthickWon 21
W#1 DoublesWes Mikel / Megan Mikel vs Dan Pichler / Alli Hiatt7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKendall Kaut / Taylor Hines vs Keith Luchtel / Nina Whitmore6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSean Kalic / Kelley Frye vs Beth Wood / Karthick Pattabiraman3-6, 4-6
2025-07-23vs Stevens, KatieLost 12
L#1 DoublesTaylor Hines / Kendall Kaut vs Luke Torgerson / Ann Cronkhite6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMegan Mikel / Wes Mikel vs Natasha Sohaib / Jeremy Turlin6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKelley Frye / Wayne Giboney vs Holly Cornelius / Prashant Vemireddy6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-20vs Pattabiraman, KarthickWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristopher Johnson / Mariko Johnson vs Karthick Pattabiraman / Beth Wood2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKendall Kaut / Taylor Hines vs Bob Elsbernd / Alli Hiatt6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTyler Stottle / Olena Reid vs Dan Pichler / Christie Montague6-3, 6-4
2025-06-13vs Hawkey, SummerWon 30
W#1 DoublesWes Mikel / Megan Mikel vs Melanie Beck / David Beck6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTaylor Hines / Kendall Kaut vs Emily Griggs / Will Griggs7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSean Kalic / Kelley Frye vs Summer Hawkey / Dustin Sherbert6-0, 6-3
2025-06-06vs Stevens, KatieWon 21
W#1 DoublesMariko Johnson / Christopher Johnson vs William Popplewell / Katie Stevens6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKelley Frye / Wayne Giboney vs John Owens / Kathleen Saysoff4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJamie Greber / Jason Norberg vs Phong Nguyen / Jennifer Huddin6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Johnson/18&over6.0X7116817165
2Stevens, Katie44101433215
3Hawkey, Summer26101434237
4Courtney, Maggie1781636246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Mariko Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.05
Wes Mikel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Olena Reid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Megan Mikel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Kelley Frye
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Jamie Greber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Kendall Kaut
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.81
Taylor Hines
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.72
Sean Kalic
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Mitch Klingenberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Matthew Reid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Jason Norberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Wayne Giboney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tyler Stottle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wes Mikel + Megan Mikel10653% games+4.1% vs expected
Kendall Kaut + Taylor Hines4647% gamesnot enough data
Olena Reid + Matthew Reid4253% gamesnot enough data
Jamie Greber + Sean Kalic2344% gamesnot enough data
Jamie Greber + Jason Norberg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mariko Johnson
48W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.08
Wes Mikel
34W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Olena Reid
24W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Megan Mikel
32W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Kelley Frye
27W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Jamie Greber
23W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Kendall Kaut
11W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Taylor Hines
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Sean Kalic
9W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Mitch Klingenberg
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Matthew Reid
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Jason Norberg
5W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Wayne Giboney
3W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Tyler Stottle
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.