Teams

Team Rizvi (CONFIRMED)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - Combo Doubles 18 & Over Qualifier · 6.5 Men - FAIR OAKS

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-08vs Team Kester (CONFIRMED)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesDuncan Whitehead / Kumi Rizvi vs Rick Baker / Stephen Kiehl8-4
L#2 DoublesLaurent Noblet / Alex Cipcic vs Francis Marcone / Felix Camacho6-8
W#3 DoublesJun Yang Lei / Chris Antley vs Phillip Khayat / Carlton Wood8-5
2026-08-08vs Team Duggirala (CONFIRMED)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMatthew Hamby / Arvind Reddy vs Imran Pasha Mohammad Abdul / Mallikharjuna Reddy Notu6-8
L#2 DoublesLaurent Noblet / Kumi Rizvi vs Sudheer Kumar / Prabhakaran Karunanithi2-8
W#3 DoublesChris Antley / Stuart Golley vs Dilip Duggirala / Suman Rumalla8-0
2026-08-08vs Team Krishnamurthy (CONFIRMED)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCaleb Tucker / Alex Cipcic vs Gopinath Rajendran / Dhinakar Gopalakrishnan8-4
L#2 DoublesArvind Reddy / John Winkler vs Senthilrajan Vaithianathan / Sathiyaraj Rajagopal8-9
L#3 DoublesJun Yang Lei / Kumi Rizvi vs Rajesh Krishnamurthy / Vivek Kandasamy3-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.5 Men - FAIR OAKS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team Duggirala (CONFIRMED)*3072248
2Team Krishnamurthy (CONFIRMED)*2154463
3Team Rizvi (CONFIRMED)*1245554
4Team Kester (CONFIRMED)*0327768

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Stuart Golley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Arvind Reddy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Jun Yang Lei
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
John Winkler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Matthew Hamby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Tyler Newton
published
2.99
Chris Antley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Alex Cipcic
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Kumi Rizvi
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Thomas Leslie
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stuart Golley
12W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Arvind Reddy
21W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Jun Yang Lei
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.25
John Winkler
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.17
Matthew Hamby
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.10
Tyler Newton
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Chris Antley
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Alex Cipcic
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Kumi Rizvi
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Thomas Leslie
5W–0L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.