Teams

Carol Rollins

2025 Adult Mixed 55 & Over League · 7.0 Sr Mixed Doubles

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-04vs MO/Horvit/55&Over7.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Barnard / Sandra Sanders vs Lynelle Phillips / Kevin Everett2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDoug Erb / Nancy Rahmeyer vs Donna Hoffmann / Brock Jones3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJane Gardner / Chris Jewell vs Laurie Everett / William Parks4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-04vs MO/Horvit/55&Over7.0XLost 12
L#1 DoublesDoug Erb / Nancy Rahmeyer vs Donna Hoffmann / Brock Jones6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Barnard / Sandra Sanders vs Beverly Horvit / William Parks4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesChris Jewell / Carol Rollins vs Pam McAllister / David Rees6-4, 6-2
2025-09-15vs MOWC/Kim/55&Over7.0XLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandra Sanders / Doug Erb vs Kara Spiva / Scott Lowery3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDebby Hunter / David Lane vs Patricia Musick / Randy Blackburn2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJane Gardner / Robert Barnard vs Christina Britt / Arbindra Rimal6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-09-08vs MOWC/Kim/55&Over7.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesSandra Sanders / Chris Jewell vs Patricia Musick / Randy Blackburn1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJane Gardner / Robert Barnard vs Kara Spiva / Scott Lowery3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJudith Haines / David Lane vs Hee-Sun Kim / Arbindra Rimal3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Sr Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Doug Erb
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Sandra Sanders
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.30
Judith Haines
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
David Lane
published 3.5
3.24
Debby Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Carol Rollins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Jane Gardner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Chris Jewell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Rahmeyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Barnard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Doug Erb
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
Sandra Sanders
49W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
Judith Haines
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
David Lane
10W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Debby Hunter
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Carol Rollins
40W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jane Gardner
57W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
Chris Jewell
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Rahmeyer
31W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Barnard
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.