Teams

Framed

2022 Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over · Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-21vs Net BlazersLost 02
L#2 DoublesMatthew Ganney / Tony Chin vs Ishmael Alejo / Michael Zehr4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Kidwell Slak / Randall Brater vs Brett Otero / Tom Smith3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-07-20vs Net BlazersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRandall Brater / Tony Chin vs Demetrius Crawford / Chris McNair5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDan Fredman / Matthew Ganney vs J Nathan / Brett Otero7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-07-19vs Net BlazersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Brown / Randall Brater vs Richard Sexton / J Nathan6-7, 3-5
W#2 DoublesMatthew Ganney / Ricardo Green vs Demetrius Crawford / Brett Otero6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2022-07-19vs Net BlazersLost 01
L#3 DoublesMatthew Ganney / Clifton Wynter vs Michael Zehr / Tom Smith4-6, 4-6
2022-07-17vs Net BlazersLost 02
L#1 DoublesDan Fredman / Ricardo Green vs Michael Zehr / Tom Smith3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMarcus Moore / Matthew Ganney vs Richard Sexton / Brett Otero3-6, 2-6
2022-07-07vs Net BlazersLost 01
L#1 SinglesMatthew Ganney vs Amit Kapadia3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Randall Brater
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Ricardo Green
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.45
Dan Fredman
published 4
3.34
Marcus Moore
published
3.11
Matthew Ganney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
Jeffrey Brown
published
Segun Eubanks
published
Tony Chin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randall Brater + Matthew Ganney4845% gamesnot enough data
Randall Brater + Ricardo Green213 matchesnot enough data
Ricardo Green + Matthew Ganney213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Randall Brater
55W–75L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
David Kidwell Slak
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Ricardo Green
196W–152L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Dan Fredman
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
Marcus Moore
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Matthew Ganney
61W–156L career · 6 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
Jeffrey Brown
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Segun Eubanks
6W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tony Chin
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.