← Teams

SAC-Frasier/Vu

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Matt Zhou
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3.5
—
Craig Frasier
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #2 Doubles 15% · published 3.5
2.78
Ed de la Fuente
usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3
—
Peter Brandenburger
usually #3 Doubles 31%, also #1 Singles 31% · published 0
Results13 ties
2019-09-28Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesCarla Wheeler / Craig Frasier vs Lynn StSauver / James Jovanovich6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2019-09-28Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesCarla Wheeler / Craig Frasier vs Greg Brewer / Mari Bailey6-3, 6-4
2019-09-27Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesCarla Wheeler / Craig Frasier vs Chiyuki Sugimoto / Chris Blankenship7-6, 7-5
2019-06-15Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesCarla Wheeler / Craig Frasier vs Janice Ackley / Martin Jeffrey Binns6-2, 6-1
2019-06-14Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesCarla Wheeler / Craig Frasier vs Catherine Leedy / Robert Crawford6-0, 6-3
2019-03-31Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesBinh Vu / Craig Frasier vs Christopher Thomas / Bruce Robertson6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMatt Zhou vs Jonathan Pulvers6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPeter Brandenburger / Ed de la Fuente vs Edward Vranizan / Jonathan Harms7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2019-03-03Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKok Waii Wong / Craig Frasier vs Hoover Li / Chuck Yett6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesPeter Brandenburger vs Tony Mattos6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Gilbertson / Matt Zhou vs Frank Brown / Paul Stutzman6-1, 6-3
2019-02-24Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBinh Vu / Craig Frasier vs Mark Bernazzani / Wes Haas3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPeter Brandenburger vs Bala Prashanth Reddy Chappidi6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKok Waii Wong / Ed de la Fuente vs Julian Miller / Kristopher Kobin6-0, 6-1
2019-02-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMichael Gilbertson / Ed de la Fuente vs John Markealli / Dean Waters7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMatt Zhou / Kok Waii Wong vs Keith Westrum / Frank Brown4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPeter Brandenburger / Craig Frasier vs Charles Hart / Rick Ward6-4, 6-1
2019-02-02Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAtul Bhargava / Craig Frasier vs Pat Nevin / David Ritchie1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMatt Zhou vs Ed Stoner6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPeter Brandenburger / Michael Gilbertson vs Richard Jennings / Jeffrey Shafer7-6, 6-2
2019-01-19Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesCraig Frasier / Ed de la Fuente vs Richard Clark / Mark Trapanese6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMatt Zhou vs Alex Harbell4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesPeter Brandenburger vs Kevin Sullivan3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2019-01-12Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesTony Yaptangco / Craig Frasier vs Marc Alexander / Edward Lang6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEd de la Fuente / Michael Gilbertson vs Tony Humpage / Dave Hall6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesPeter Brandenburger vs Jack Menashe6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKok Waii Wong / Matt Zhou vs Tom Sloan / Mark Meyer5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2019-01-06Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesBinh Vu / Craig Frasier vs Philip Stephenson / Richard Jennings6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMatt Zhou / Peter Brandenburger vs Tim Anderson / Simon Lofts6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Matt Zhou
63W–65L career
0%73%27%
3.53
3.5
Craig Frasier
108W–75L career
not enough data
—
3
Ed de la Fuente
78W–81L career
0%99%0%
2.78
0
Peter Brandenburger
21W–20L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.