Teams

GSTL40/Lane/Stables

2025 Combo 40 & Over- GSTL · Adult WOMEN - 7.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-01vs GSTL40/Smith/PrestwickWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Drosieko / Tara Crammer vs Patti Conrad / Amy Canavan6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAlison Hayes / Linda Lane vs Rene Smith / Cory Brown5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlice Whiteside / Amanda Davis vs Stacy Hughes / Kimberly Hale0-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-24vs GSTL40/Pavy /PrestwickWon 30
W#1 DoublesCamilla Parker / Elizabeth Foxworth vs Allison DeVaux / Debbie Moore6-3, 1-1
W#2 DoublesElle Jones / Meredith Monroe vs Shital Patel / Myla Cabildo6-3, 2-1
W#3 DoublesDoreen Cribb / Kylie Vaughn vs Debbie Johnson / Kristy Stocks6-2, 6-2
2025-09-03vs GSTL40/Bass/DunesWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmanda Davis / Camilla Parker vs Deborah Conner / Amanda Battisti5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDoreen Cribb / Stella Mercado vs Beth Warstler / Amanda Hadstate6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesElle Jones / Marguerite Oliver vs Dipti Paudel / Shannon Fries2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-27vs GSTL40/Smith/PrestwickWon 21
W#1 DoublesTara Crammer / Alice Puckett vs Stacy Hughes / Michele Singleton5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElle Jones / Meredith Monroe vs Lucy OHare / Cynthia Moran6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDoreen Cribb / Linda Lane vs Shannon Sommers / Rosemary Folk6-7, 3-6
2025-08-26vs GSTL40/Bass/DunesWon 21
L#1 DoublesJulee Reslewic / Linda Lane vs Becky Walls / Mary Singleton6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDoreen Cribb / Kylie Vaughn vs Shai Kahn / Amanda Battisti6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Foxworth / Camilla Parker vs Celeste Jackson / Katie Sandoz6-2, 6-1
2025-08-21vs GSTL40/Pavy /PrestwickWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulee Reslewic / Meredith Monroe vs Sarah LaPerle / Elizabeth Daniel6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlice Whiteside / Amanda Davis vs Kimberly Case / Laurie Denny6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMarguerite Oliver / Doreen Cribb vs Suzanne Senchak / Joanne Comb6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult WOMEN - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alice Whiteside
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Alison Hayes
published 4
3.71
Alice Puckett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Amanda Drosieko
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Camilla Parker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.31
Elle Jones
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Kylie Vaughn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Elizabeth Foxworth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Doreen Cribb
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.16
Tara Crammer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Linda Lane
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Meredith Monroe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Marguerite Oliver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julee Reslewic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stella Mercado
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doreen Cribb + Alice Puckett5160% games+8.2% vs expected
Meredith Monroe + Elle Jones6649% games+7.8% vs expected
Doreen Cribb + Elizabeth Foxworth4157% games+6.3% vs expected
Tara Crammer + Stella Mercado8261% games+6.3% vs expected
Doreen Cribb + Camilla Parker3250% games−7.7% vs expected
Amanda Drosieko + Tara Crammer123 matchesnot enough data
Doreen Cribb + Meredith Monroe123 matchesnot enough data
Doreen Cribb + Kylie Vaughn213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alice Whiteside
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Alison Hayes
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Alice Puckett
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Amanda Drosieko
16W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Camilla Parker
32W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Elle Jones
21W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.31
Kylie Vaughn
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
Elizabeth Foxworth
45W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
Doreen Cribb
32W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Tara Crammer
31W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
Linda Lane
23W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Meredith Monroe
24W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Marguerite Oliver
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Julee Reslewic
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stella Mercado
13W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.