Teams

FYC - Torres

2026 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-22vs Eagle Landing - BrinkLost 23
W#1 DoublesClaire Do / Katrina Torres vs Rebecca Padgett / Maureen Ruiz7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTara Volpe vs Stacy Johns6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Kent / Molly Renaud vs Susan Brink / Diane Forhan0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSara Bertoch / Monica Hentschel vs Tiffany Carnes / Dionyse Fitzwilliam1-6, 1-6
W#4 DoublesLauren Griffith / Ashli Nixon vs June Bliss / Teresa Scott6-2, 6-3
2026-03-17vs Planet Swim - EulenfeldLost 14
W#1 DoublesKatrina Torres / Lauren Griffith vs Tory Eulenfeld / Kagin DiBella6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesTara Volpe vs Sarah Hanson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSally Peebles / Raeanne McCarty vs Samantha Vanderbilt / Nelda Guerra-Smith4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAdrienne Kent / Claire Do vs Marnie Giancola / Rebecca Roberts3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#4 DoublesSara Bertoch / Gina Bradley vs Julie Clampitt / Sheila Pensotti6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-08vs Eagle Harbor - RouseLost 13
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Kent / Melinda Gibbs vs Stephanie Rouse / Kristen Hughes1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesStephanie Wilder vs Theresa Cumpstone6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRaeanne McCarty / Holly Williams vs Deana Jones / Lori Mercer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTara Volpe / Cheryl Virta vs Sarah Cornell / Beth Jansen6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2026-02-22vs Southside - AtkinsLost 23
W#1 DoublesAshli Nixon / Raeanne McCarty vs Irene Wolfe / Staci Hill6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesClaire Do vs Jennifer Stokes6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGina Bradley / Cheryl Flanders vs Jen Graham / Sandy Wedge5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStephanie Wilder / Whitney George vs Katja Leuthold / Angela Atkins4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#4 DoublesCecilia House / Monica Hentschel vs Lori Osachy / Phinely Popera5-7, 6-7
2026-02-15vs Duval/BoretskySplit 22
L#1 DoublesSally Peebles / Cecilia House vs Sherry Hutzler / Narong Khan3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTara Volpe vs Mandy Riceman2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesHolly Williams / Sara Bertoch vs Denise Darracott / Patricia Lombardo7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKatrina Torres / Claire Do vs Jacqueline Boretsky / Stephanie Herr6-3, 6-4
2026-01-25vs San Jose - de AndradeLost 23
L#1 DoublesSally Peebles / Stephanie Wilder vs Ali Griffin / Carissa Hammel1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTara Volpe vs MELINDA M STIVERS6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLauren Griffith / Katrina Torres vs Phyllis Crabtree / Stacy Clark6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelinda Gibbs / Claire Do vs Tracy Libby / Evelyn Tovar4-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesHolly Williams / Sara Bertoch vs Dixie McDaniel de Andrade / Cynthia Hodges2-6, 0-6
2026-01-11vs Palencia - MartyakLost 05
L#1 DoublesCheryl Flanders / Gina Bradley vs Iulia Platte / Laura Jimenez2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesClaire Do vs Cristin Lindroos5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAshli Nixon / Raeanne McCarty vs Lanay Gearhart / Shannon Downs2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKatrina Torres / Sara Bertoch vs Valerie Dolan / Maureen Martyak1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#4 DoublesHolly Williams / Monica Hentschel vs Michelle Meyer-Devlin / Lindy Lollar2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Lauren Griffith
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Ashli Nixon
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Tara Volpe
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Cheryl Flanders
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Cheryl Virta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Stephanie Wilder
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Katrina Torres
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.69
Sally Peebles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Gina Bradley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Cecilia House
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.59
Monica Hentschel
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.59
Claire Do
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.55
Adrienne Kent
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
Sara Bertoch
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
2.43
Raeanne McCarty
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Melinda Gibbs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Molly Renaud
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Whitney George
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Flanders + Gina Bradley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Griffith
10W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Ashli Nixon
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
Tara Volpe
8W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Cheryl Flanders
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Cheryl Virta
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Wilder
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Katrina Torres
18W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Sally Peebles
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
2.69
Gina Bradley
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
3
Cecilia House
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
Monica Hentschel
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Claire Do
7W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Adrienne Kent
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Sara Bertoch
7W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.46
Raeanne McCarty
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.43
Melinda Gibbs
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Molly Renaud
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Whitney George
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.