Teams

Ke.O'Rourke18A3.0

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-04vs Je.Boney18ALost 01
L#1 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Carson Schuch2-6, 0-6
2025-04-27Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Lauren Gray3-6, 4-6
2025-04-13vs Me.Paris18ALost 02
L#1 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Lorah Henry1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAlise Fredrickson vs Ferebee Plyler2-6, 2-6
2025-04-06vs La.Kane18ASplit 11
L#2 DoublesSofia Switzer / Jessica Tyndall vs Eva Frecker / Sabrina Kane2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAlise Fredrickson vs Keeley McCormick6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-30vs Ka.Barsness18ALost 02
L#1 SinglesAlise Fredrickson vs Kari Barsness3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Griffin Lamb1-6, 1-6
2025-03-30Won 10
W#1 SinglesAlise Fredrickson vs Jessica Williams5-7, 6-2
2025-03-29vs Sa.Forman18ALost 01
L#2 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Allison Shipe7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-02vs Su.Albion18AWon 10
W#1 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Vickie Gibbs6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Clare Mayo
published 3
2.90
Alise Fredrickson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.85
Shannon Grady
published
2.80
Allie Hammond
published 3
2.66
Lea Ricks
published
2.62
Jessica Tyndall
usually #1 Singles 73%, also #2 Singles 18% · published 2.5
2.57
Kelly O'Rourke
published
2.54
Sofia Switzer
published
2.31
Samantha Siano
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.28
Ciara Whipp
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly O'Rourke + Clare Mayo213 matchesnot enough data
Allie Hammond + Ciara Whipp213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Clare Mayo
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Alise Fredrickson
62W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Shannon Grady
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Allie Hammond
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Lea Ricks
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
2.5
Jessica Tyndall
47W–70L career · 11 lines in 2025
0%20%80%
2.62
Kelly O'Rourke
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
Sofia Switzer
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Samantha Siano
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Ciara Whipp
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.