Teams

NE/Penland/55&Over7.0M

2026 NE Adult 55&Over · 7.0 Adult Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-20vs WesterLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatthew Bendler / Satya Maddipati vs Richard Shaw / Hani Haider6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRoger Thompson / Ty Strawhecker vs Tom Hageman / CHRIS PERRONE2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRonn Winquest / Greg Allen vs David Arterburn / Charles Hunsinger3-6, 2-6
2026-06-06vs BanksWon 30
W#1 DoublesMike Gardner / Michael Ebert vs Adrian Blake / Glenn Thomson6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDale Dixon / Roger Penland vs Lloyd Haight / Seth Burmeister6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrad Miller / Lynn Bluml vs Mark Higgins / Dale Banks6-1, 6-3
2026-05-30vs NEWC/Green/55&Over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesRonn Winquest / Lynn Bluml vs Gareth Canaan / Rick Lorimer4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSatya Maddipati / Johnny Hass vs Roger Sunderman / Rodney Ware2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRoger Penland / Ty Strawhecker vs Roderick Harley / Peter Eppens6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-16vs WesterWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrad Miller / Ronn Winquest vs Robert Wester / David Dorsett6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesYing Zhang / Johnny Hass vs CHRIS PERRONE / Richard Shaw3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDale Dixon / Roger Thompson vs Craig Hendricks / David Arterburn6-2, 6-0
2026-05-09vs BanksWon 30
W#1 DoublesYing Zhang / Johnny Hass vs Dale Banks / Glenn Thomson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRonn Winquest / Lynn Bluml vs Adrian Blake / Shawn Murray6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRoger Penland / Greg Allen vs Lloyd Haight / Seth Burmeister6-0, 6-4
2026-05-02vs NEWC/Green/55&Over7.0MWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatthew Bendler / Dale Dixon vs Kreg Green / Joseph Chiu6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrad Miller / Satya Maddipati vs Roger Sunderman / JP Jamison6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMike Gardner / Michael Ebert vs Gareth Canaan / Peter Eppens6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0 Adult Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE/Penland/55&Over7.0M4212612116
2NEWC/Green/55&Over7.0M4212614130
3Wester237817128
4Banks1421327169

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Dale Dixon
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Satya Maddipati
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Mike Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Matthew Bendler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Brad Miller
published 3.5
3.25
Michael Ebert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Roger Penland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Johnny Hass
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Greg Allen
published
Lynn Bluml
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roger Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Ronn Winquest
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Ty Strawhecker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Ying Zhang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Gardner + Michael Ebert32863% games+4.7% vs expected
Greg Allen + Roger Penland8555% games−4.0% vs expected
Lynn Bluml + Ronn Winquest3358% gamesnot enough data
Ronn Winquest + Brad Miller224 matchesnot enough data
Greg Allen + Michael Ebert123 matchesnot enough data
Greg Allen + Ronn Winquest033 matchesnot enough data
Ty Strawhecker + Roger Penland213 matchesnot enough data
Ty Strawhecker + Roger Thompson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dale Dixon
73W–46L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
Satya Maddipati
90W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Mike Gardner
125W–58L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Matthew Bendler
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Brad Miller
9W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Ebert
39W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Roger Penland
76W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.15
Johnny Hass
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
2.88
Greg Allen
22W–26L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lynn Bluml
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Roger Thompson
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ronn Winquest
17W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ty Strawhecker
34W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ying Zhang
16W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.