← TeamsLCC-Schweitz/Mam
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Men
2 players · average NTRP 4.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON
Scouting
Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
—
Phalkun Mamusually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 5
Results8 ties
2025-07-12Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesEllen Mader / Phalkun Mam vs Khaliun Enkhjargal / Evan Pan6-2, 7-6
2025-07-12Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesSansriti Ranjan / Phalkun Mam vs Kaci Okumoto / Hans PODLIPNIK Castillo6-4, 6-1
2025-07-11Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesKelly Mohr / Phalkun Mam vs Erica Lee / David Robin6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-21Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesKRISTIAN PEEV / Phalkun Mam vs Brenden Barrows / Ian Paik6-2, 6-4
2025-06-08Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesShouta Fukamachi / Phalkun Mam vs Alexander Canellopoulos / Nick Buckley6-4, 6-4
2025-05-11Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesLew de Leon / Phalkun Mam vs Andrew Bryan / John Closi7-6, 6-2
2025-05-10Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesPhalkun Mam / Andrew Kells vs WILLIAM EDWARDS / Nick Buckley6-2, 6-3
2024-12-15Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesPhalkun Mam / Deborah Naugler vs Juan Padilla / Kaytlynn Kolb6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete.
Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.
Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.